Abstract
Within the framework of advancing educational evaluation reform in the modern era, establishing a scientific and rational assessment system for the quality of teacher’s instruction holds immense importance. This contributes to the further development of autonomous evaluations within colleges and universities, fosters enhancements in higher education evaluation systems, and supports the modernization of higher education governance. Considering the evolving demands for cultivating excellence in higher education, the assessment of teachers’ instructional quality continues to face challenges, encompassing evaluation criteria, categorization guidelines, system enhancements, digital adaptation, and more. In the construction of a quality assessment system for teacher’s instruction in higher education, continuous optimization of the evaluation system for teaching quality is essential. This optimization should be driven by scientific principles, grounded in collaboration between teachers and students, and aligned with fundamental principles, including categorized assessment, process orientation, digital integration, and more.
Reference10 articles.
1. Wang Xiaobo, Qiu Huiting. Exploring the practical teaching of “group work” course under the perspective of constructivism theory. Heilongjiang Education (Theory and Practice). (11) 71–74 (2023).
2. Yoders S. Constructivism Theory and Use from 21st Century Perspective. Journal of Applied Learning Technology. 4(3) (2014).
3. Liu Bin, Zhang Wenlan, Jiang Yujun. Online course learning experience:connotation, development and influencing factors. China Electrified Education. (10) 90–96 (2016).
4. Segundo-Marcos R., Carrillo A. M. Development of executive functions in late childhood and the mediating role of cooperative learning: A longitudinal study. Cognitive Development (63)101–219(2022).