Abstract
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) uses the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules as parent rules. Yet proble ms exist in the interpretation and application of intellectual property terms, which can easily cause controversy. The protection rules of the geographical indications (GI) are used as a magic weapon to promote Chinese high-quality agriculturalproducts to the world. But due to the left and right swaying of the legislators, they are chaotic and thus need to be improved urgently. In this case, China’s GI protection should focus on disputed solutions, balancing legislators’ initiatives and autonomy generated by geographical indication, and solving the historical problems of many departments overlapping management.
Reference12 articles.
1. Exploring the Economic Rationale for Protecting Geographical Indicators in Agriculture
2. Wang X., Yin Y., The Dilemma and Development of China’s Geographical Indication Protection System in the Context of . Journal of Guizhou University, 40 (2022)
3. Yang G.H. The relationship between RCEP and WTO rules. International Business Studies, 5 (2021)
4. Rippon M. J., Traditional foods, territorial boundaries and the TRIPS Agreement: the case of the Melton Mowbray Pork Pie. J. World Intellectual Property, 16 (2013)
5. Delphine M., LAURENCE B., JEAN-PIERRE B., FRANCOIS C., Are French geographical indications losing their soul? Analyzing recent developments in the governance of the link to the origin in France. World Development, 98 (2017)