Abstract
We survey two aspects of mixed-integer nonlinear programming which have attracted less attention (so far) than solution methods, solvers and applications: namely, whether the class of these problems can be solved algorithmically, and, for the subclasses which can, whether they are hard to solve. We start by reviewing the problem of representing a solution, which is linked to the correct abstract computational model to consider. We then cast some traditional logic results in the light of mixed-integer nonlinear programming, and come to the conclusion that it is not a solvable class: instead, its formal sentences belong to two different theories, one of which is decidable while the other is not. Lastly, we give a tutorial on computational complexity and survey some interesting hardness results in nonconvex quadratic and nonlinear programming.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Computer Science Applications,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference89 articles.
1. NP-hardness of deciding convexity of quartic polynomials and related problems
2. Bardet M., Faugère J.C. and Salvy B., On the complexity of Gröbner basis computation of semi-regular overdetermined algebraic equations, in Proceedings of International Conference on Polynomial System Solving (2004).
3. Basu S., Pollack R. and Roy M.-F., Algorithms, in Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer, New York (2006).
4. Beeker N., Gaubert S., Glusa C. and Liberti L., Is the distance geometry problem in NP?, in Distance Geometry: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Edited by Mucherino A., Lavor C., Liberti L. and Maculan N.. Springer, New York (2013) 85–94.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献