Data comparisons and uncertainty: a roadmap for gaining in competence and improving the reliability of results

Author:

Charki Abdérafi,Pavese Franco

Abstract

This paper traces a roadmap for gaining in competence and for improving the reliability of results in a laboratory. The roadmap was built from the requirements concerning the results quality and measurement uncertainty, which accreditation bodies use for the accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories. In industry, accreditation is the accepted proof of a laboratory's assigned level of competence. The level of performance of a laboratory is demonstrated through the quality of its management of test and calibration results. Inter-laboratory comparisons and the evaluation of measurement uncertainties are recommended as the most appropriate methods for demonstrating continuous improvement in laboratories. The common methods used for data comparisons and for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties are highlighted. An overview of the main indicators used in data comparisons is presented. Some recommendations are made that are useful to the design of a roadmap for gaining in competence and for improving the quality of results obtained by a laboratory.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference25 articles.

1. ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (ISO, Geneva (Switzerland), 2017)

2. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3, Uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM: 1995) (ISO, Geneva (Switzerland), 2008)

3. ISO 13528, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison (ISO, Geneva (Switzerland), 2015)

4. ISO 5725-Part 1 to 6, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results (ISO, Geneva (Switzerland), 1994)

5. Thompson M., Ellison S., Wood R., The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistries laboratories, Pure Appl. Chem. 78 , (2006), DOI: 10.1351/pac200678010145

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3