Cluster counts

Author:

Ilić Stéphane,Sakr Ziad,Blanchard Alain

Abstract

The Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) concordance model is very successful at describing our Universe with high accuracy and only a few parameters. Despite its successes, a few tensions persist; most notably, the best-fit ΛCDM model, as derived from the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, largely overpredicts the abundance of Sunyaev–Zel’dovich (SZ) clusters when using their standard mass calibration. Whether this is the sign of an incorrect calibration or the need for new physics remains a matter of debate. In this study, we examined two simple extensions of the standard model and their ability to release the aforementioned tension: massive neutrinos and a simple modified gravity model via a non-standard growth index γ. We used both the Planck CMB power spectra and SZ cluster counts as datasets, alone and in combination with local X-ray clusters. In the case of massive neutrinos, the cluster-mass calibration (1 − b) is constrained to 0.585+0.031−0.037 (68% limits), more than 5σ away from its standard value (1 − b)∼0.8. We found little correlation between neutrino masses and cluster calibration, corroborating previous conclusions derived from X-ray clusters; massive neutrinos do not alleviate the cluster-CMB tension. With our simple γ model, we found a large correlation between the calibration and the growth index γ, but contrary to local X-ray clusters, SZ clusters are able to break the degeneracy between the two parameters thanks to their extended redshift range. The calibration (1 − b) was then constrained to 0.602+0.053−0.065, leading to an interesting constraint on γ = 0.60 ± 0.13. When both massive neutrinos and modified gravity were allowed, preferred values remained centred on standard ΛCDM values, but a calibration (1 − b)∼0.8 was allowed (though only at the 2σ level) provided ∑mν ∼ 0.34 eV and γ ∼ 0.8. We conclude that massive neutrinos do not relieve the cluster-CMB tension, and that a calibration close to the standard value (1 − b)∼0.8 would call for new physics in the gravitational sector.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3