Relevance of the small frequency separation for asteroseismic stellar age, mass, and radius

Author:

Valle G.ORCID,Dell’Omodarme M.,Prada Moroni P. G.,Degl’Innocenti S.

Abstract

Aims. We performed a theoretical analysis aimed at quantifying the relevance of the small frequency separation δν in determining stellar ages, masses, and radii. We aimed to establish a minimum uncertainty on these quantities for low-mass stars across different evolutionary stages of the main sequence and to evaluate the biases that come from some systematic differences between the stellar model grid adopted for the recovery and the observed stars. Methods. We adopted the Stellar CharactEristics Pisa Estimation gRid (SCEPtER) pipeline for low-mass stars, [0.7, 1.05] M, from the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) to the central hydrogen depletion. For each model in the grid, we computed oscillation frequencies. Synthetic stars were generated and reconstructed based on different assumptions about the relative precision in the δν parameter (namely 5% and 2%). The quantification of the systematic errors arising from a possible mismatch between synthetic stars and the recovery grid was performed by generating stars from synthetic grids of stellar models with different initial helium abundance and microscopic diffusion efficiency. The results obtained without δν as an observable are included for comparison. Results. The investigation highlighted and confirmed the improvement in the age estimates when δν is available, which has already been reported in the literature. While the biases were negligible, the statistical error affecting age estimates was strongly dependent on the stellar evolutionary phase. The error is at its maximum at ZAMS and it decreases to about 11% and 6% (δν known at 5% and 2% level, respectively) when stars reach the 30% of their evolutionary MS lifetime. The usefulness of small frequency separation in improving age estimates vanishes in the last 20% of the MS. The availability of δν in the fit for mass and radius estimates provided an effect that was nearly identical to its effect on age, assuming an observational uncertainty of 5%. As a departure, with respect to age estimates, no benefit was detected for mass and radius determinations from a reduction of the observational error in δν to 2%. The age variability attributed to differences in the initial helium abundance resulted in negligible results owing to compensation effects that have already been discussed in previous works. On the other hand, the current uncertainty in the initial helium abundance leads to a greater bias (2% and 1% level) in mass and radius estimates whenever δν is in the observational pool. This result, together with the presence of further unexplored uncertainty sources, suggest that precision in the derived stellar quantities below these thresholds may possibly be overoptimistic. The impact of microscopic diffusion was investigated by adopting a grid of models for the recovery which totally neglected the process. The availability of the small frequency separation resulted in biases lower than 5% and 2% for observational errors of 5% and 2%, respectively. The estimates of mass and radius showed again a greater distortion when δν is included among the observables. These biases are at the level of 1%, confirming that threshold as a minimum realistic uncertainty on the derived stellar quantities. Finally, we compared the estimates by the SCEPtER pipeline for 13 Kepler asteroseismic LEGACY sample stars with those given by six different pipelines from literature. This procedure demonstrated a fair agreement for the results. The comparison suggests that a realistic approach to the determination of the error on the estimated parameters consists of approximately doubling the error in the recovered stellar characteristics from a single pipeline. Overall, on the LEGACY sample data, we obtained a multi-pipeline precision of about 4.4%, 1.7%, and 11% on the estimated masses, radii, and ages, respectively.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3