X-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive stars at low metallicity

Author:

Sander A. A. C.ORCID,Bouret J.-C.ORCID,Bernini-Peron M.ORCID,Puls J.ORCID,Backs F.ORCID,Berlanas S. R.,Bestenlehner J. M.ORCID,Brands S. A.ORCID,Herrero A.ORCID,Martins F.ORCID,Maryeva O.,Pauli D.ORCID,Ramachandran V.ORCID,Crowther P. A.,Gómez-González V. M. A.,Gormaz-Matamala A. C.ORCID,Hamann W.-R.ORCID,Hillier D. J.,Kuiper R.ORCID,Larkin C. J. K.,Lefever R. R.ORCID,Mehner A.ORCID,Najarro F.ORCID,Oskinova L. M.ORCID,Schösser E. C.,Shenar T.ORCID,Todt H.,ud-Doula A.ORCID,Vink J. S.ORCID

Abstract

Context. The spectral analysis of hot, massive stars is a fundamental astrophysical method of determining their intrinsic properties and feedback. With their inherent, radiation-driven winds, the quantitative spectroscopy for hot, massive stars requires detailed numerical modeling of the atmosphere and an iterative treatment in order to obtain the best solution within a given framework. Aims. We present an overview of different techniques for the quantitative spectroscopy of hot stars employed within the X-Shooting ULLYSES collaboration, ranging from grid-based approaches to tailored spectral fits. By performing a blind test for selected targets, we gain an overview of the similarities and differences between the resulting stellar and wind parameters. Our study is not a systematic benchmark between different codes or methods; our aim is to provide an overview of the parameter spread caused by different approaches. Methods. For three different stars from the XShooting ULLYSES sample (SMC O5 star AzV 377, LMC O7 star Sk -69° 50, and LMC O9 star Sk-66° 171), we employ different stellar atmosphere codes (CMFGEN, Fastwind, PoWR) and different strategies to determine their best-fitting model solutions. For our analyses, UV and optical spectroscopy are used to derive the stellar and wind properties with some methods relying purely on optical data for comparison. To determine the overall spectral energy distribution, we further employ additional photometry from the literature. Results. The effective temperatures found for each of the three different sample stars agree within 3 kK, while the differences in log g can be up to 0.2 dex. Luminosity differences of up to 0.1 dex result from different reddening assumptions, which seem to be systematically larger for the methods employing a genetic algorithm. All sample stars are found to be enriched in nitrogen. The terminal wind velocities are surprisingly similar and do not strictly follow the uTeff relation. Conclusions. We find reasonable agreement in terms of the derived stellar and wind parameters between the different methods. Tailored fitting methods tend to be able to minimize or avoid discrepancies obtained with coarser or increasingly automatized treatments. The inclusion of UV spectral data is essential for the determination of realistic wind parameters. For one target (Sk -69° 50), we find clear indications of an evolved status.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Science and Technology Facilities Council

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt

Czech Academy of Sciences

NASA

Narodowe Centrum Nauki

NextGeneration EU/PRTR

European Regional Development Fund

Publisher

EDP Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3