Planck 2018 results

Author:

,Aghanim N.,Akrami Y.,Ashdown M.,Aumont J.,Baccigalupi C.,Ballardini M.,Banday A. J.,Barreiro R. B.,Bartolo N.,Basak S.,Benabed K.,Bernard J.-P.,Bersanelli M.,Bielewicz P.,Bond J. R.,Borrill J.,Bouchet F. R.,Boulanger F.,Bucher M.,Burigana C.,Calabrese E.,Cardoso J.-F.,Carron J.,Challinor A.,Chiang H. C.,Colombo L. P. L.,Combet C.,Couchot F.,Crill B. P.,Cuttaia F.,de Bernardis P.,de Rosa A.,de Zotti G.,Delabrouille J.,Delouis J.-M.,Di Valentino E.,Diego J. M.,Doré O.,Douspis M.,Ducout A.,Dupac X.,Efstathiou G.,Elsner F.,Enßlin T. A.,Eriksen H. K.,Falgarone E.,Fantaye Y.,Finelli F.,Frailis M.,Fraisse A. A.,Franceschi E.,Frolov A.,Galeotta S.,Galli S.,Ganga K.,Génova-Santos R. T.,Gerbino M.,Ghosh T.,González-Nuevo J.,Górski K. M.,Gratton S.,Gruppuso A.,Gudmundsson J. E.,Handley W.,Hansen F. K.,Henrot-Versillé S.,Herranz D.,Hivon E.,Huang Z.,Jaffe A. H.,Jones W. C.,Karakci A.,Keihänen E.,Keskitalo R.,Kiiveri K.,Kim J.,Kisner T. S.,Krachmalnicoff N.,Kunz M.,Kurki-Suonio H.,Lagache G.,Lamarre J.-M.,Lasenby A.,Lattanzi M.,Lawrence C. R.,Levrier F.,Liguori M.,Lilje P. B.,Lindholm V.,López-Caniego M.,Ma Y.-Z.,Macías-Pérez J. F.,Maggio G.,Maino D.,Mandolesi N.,Mangilli A.,Martin P. G.,Martínez-González E.,Matarrese S.,Mauri N.,McEwen J. D.,Melchiorri A.,Mennella A.,Migliaccio M.,Miville-Deschênes M.-A.,Molinari D.,Moneti A.,Montier L.,Morgante G.,Moss A.,Mottet S.,Natoli P.,Pagano L.,Paoletti D.,Partridge B.,Patanchon G.,Patrizii L.,Perdereau O.,Perrotta F.,Pettorino V.,Piacentini F.,Puget J.-L.,Rachen J. P.,Reinecke M.,Remazeilles M.,Renzi A.,Rocha G.,Roudier G.,Salvati L.,Sandri M.,Savelainen M.,Scott D.,Sirignano C.,Sirri G.,Spencer L. D.,Sunyaev R.,Suur-Uski A.-S.,Tauber J. A.,Tavagnacco D.,Tenti M.,Toffolatti L.,Tomasi M.,Tristram M.,Trombetti T.,Valiviita J.,Vansyngel F.,Van Tent B.,Vibert L.,Vielva P.,Villa F.,Vittorio N.,Wandelt B. D.,Wehus I. K.,Zonca A.

Abstract

This paper presents the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) data processing procedures for the Planck 2018 release. Major improvements in mapmaking have been achieved since the previous Planck 2015 release, many of which were used and described already in an intermediate paper dedicated to the Planck polarized data at low multipoles. These improvements enabled the first significant measurement of the reionization optical depth parameter using Planck-HFI data. This paper presents an extensive analysis of systematic effects, including the use of end-to-end simulations to facilitate their removal and characterize the residuals. The polarized data, which presented a number of known problems in the 2015 Planck release, are very significantly improved, especially the leakage from intensity to polarization. Calibration, based on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) dipole, is now extremely accurate and in the frequency range 100–353 GHz reduces intensity-to-polarization leakage caused by calibration mismatch. The Solar dipole direction has been determined in the three lowest HFI frequency channels to within one arc minute, and its amplitude has an absolute uncertainty smaller than 0.35 μK, an accuracy of order 10−4. This is a major legacy from the Planck HFI for future CMB experiments. The removal of bandpass leakage has been improved for the main high-frequency foregrounds by extracting the bandpass-mismatch coefficients for each detector as part of the mapmaking process; these values in turn improve the intensity maps. This is a major change in the philosophy of “frequency maps”, which are now computed from single detector data, all adjusted to the same average bandpass response for the main foregrounds. End-to-end simulations have been shown to reproduce very well the relative gain calibration of detectors, as well as drifts within a frequency induced by the residuals of the main systematic effect (analogue-to-digital convertor non-linearity residuals). Using these simulations, we have been able to measure and correct the small frequency calibration bias induced by this systematic effect at the 10−4 level. There is no detectable sign of a residual calibration bias between the first and second acoustic peaks in the CMB channels, at the 10−3 level.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 158 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3