Abstract
We examine an agricultural supply chain consisting of a core enterprise and a capital constrained farmer and assess the yield uncertainty of farmer’s production. We explore two kinds of financing models: traditional bank financing and government-enterprise guarantee financing. To coordinate the supply chain, a price commitment contract and a revenue-sharing contract are considered. Our results show that no matter in bank or government-enterprise guarantee financing model, we can find the conditions for full coordination of the supply chain with any contract. However, in the government enterprise guarantee financing model, when a farmer has bankrupt risk in a low-yield season and no bankrupt risk in a high-yield season, the revenue-sharing contract can simultaneously make the supply chain fully coordinated and achieve Pareto improvement to maximize the profits of the entire supply chain and achieve a win-win situation. In addition, the farmer and enterprise prefer to choose the financing model with a higher promised price and a higher revenue-sharing ratio, and the social welfare under the government-enterprise guarantee financing model is higher than that under the traditional bank financing model.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
National Social Science Fund of China
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Computer Science Applications,Theoretical Computer Science