Abstract
Using Scopus and national sources, I have investigated the evolution of the cost of publishing in Danish astronomy on a fine scale over a number of years. I find that the number of publications per year from Danish astronomers increased by a factor of four during 15 years: naturally, the corresponding potential cost of publishing must have increased similarly. The actual realized cost of publishing in core journals are investigated for a high profile Danish astronomy research institutions. I argue that the situation is highly unstable if the current cost scenario continues, and I speculate that Danish astronomy is risking a scholarly communication collapse due to the combination of increasing subscription cost, increased research output, and increased direct publishing costs related to Open Access and other page charges.
Reference6 articles.
1. Open access: The true cost of science publishing
2. Björk B.-C., Solomon D., Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (Report from Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom, 2014)
3. Schimmer R., Geschuhn K. K., Vogler A., Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (Max Planck Digital Library Open Access Policy White Paper, Germany, 2015)
4. Gauffriau M., Larsen A. V., Lianez K. H., Transition from the License to read model to Open Access publishing. A Danish study (DEFF Report, Denmark, 2016)
5. Murphy K., "Should all research papers be free?", The New York Times, March 12 (2016)