Review and comparison of two OpenFOAM® solvers: rhoCentralFoam and sonicFoam-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Review and comparison of two OpenFOAM® solvers: rhoCentralFoam and sonicFoam

Published:2024 Issue: Volume:299 Page:01005
ISSN:2100-014X
Container-title:EPJ Web of Conferences
language:
Short-container-title:EPJ Web of Conf.

Author:

Canteros Maria Laura,Polanský Jiří

Abstract

This article deals with the comparison and review of two solvers from the open-source CFD tool, OpenFOAM®, in the field of compressible fluids: the explicit segregated density-based solver (rhoCentralFoam), and the PIMPLE algorithm solver (sonicFoam). In spite of the numerous studies showing both solvers, there are not yet been presented complete flowcharts. This work will expose the creation of two flowcharts based on bibliographic review. For the purpose of the demonstration of the application of the two solvers, the Mach number, and the mass flow rate in time in the current case analysis are numerically estimated in both cases in an ISO 9300 Venturi nozzle case analysis.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Link

https://www.epj-conferences.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429901005/pdf

Reference10 articles.

1. ISO 9300:2022, Measurement of Gas Flow by Means of Critical Flow Nozzles (2022)

2. Bondarev A. E. and Kuvshinnikov A. E., in Computational Science – ICCS 2018, edited by Shi Y., Fu H., Tian Y., Krzhizhanovskaya V. V., Lees M. H., Dongarra J., and Sloot P. M. A. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 221–230

3. Alekseev A., Bondarev A., Galaktionov V., Kuvshinnikov A., and Shapiro L., Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2 paper19 (2020)

4. Kuvshinnikov A. E. and Bondarev A. E., in 2017 Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference (ISPRAS) (2017), pp. 132–136