Helping patients to learn: characteristics and types of users and uses of independent online forums on health problems and chronic conditions

Author:

Deccache CaroleORCID,Hamon Thierry,Morsa Maxime,De Andrade Vincent,Albano Maria Grazia,Gagnayre Rémi

Abstract

Background Patients are using online health forums (OHFs) to exchange about their health, diseases and treatments. Some OHFs are independent, not submitted to health care providers’ control nor to social desirability. This must probably influence the very nature of patient’s learning. Objectives: This research aims to bring some answers to the following questions: What are the characteristics of independent OHFs? What are OHF internaut patients’ profile? How do they use OHFs? Are there any characteristics that might help to understand their use of OHFs? Methods: A literature review has been undertaken querying 10 databases. The review was completed with an analysis of the “grey literature”. Eleven keywords were used singly or in combination. The article selection was conducted by two independent researchers. Results: 23 documents were selected and analysed. Five OHF definitions, three user’s classifications and four OHF uses were identified and analysed. Discussion: The review allowed us to 1) formulate a definition of a chronic health conditions oriented OHF, 2) describe its characteristics, 3) suggest a users’ classification and, 4) describe the four OHF uses. Conclusions: Independent OHF is a virtual and free space beyond institutional control. It may be considered as a learning and educational media, formal and informal, and spontaneous. The understanding of the knowledge acquisition processes and strategies among OHF users is necessary in order to use this web tool as patient education strategy.

Funder

GIS-IReSP

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference60 articles.

1. Cole J, Kleine D, Watkins C. Internet discussion forums: Maximizing choice in health-seeking behaviour during public health emergencies. 2016 Int Conf Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Anal Assessment (CyberSA), 2016 June: 1–4. doi: 10.1109/CyberSA.2016.7503283.

2. Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?

3. Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums

4. Fox S, Duggan M. 2013. Health Online 2013. Available from http://www.pewInternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf.

5. Thoër C. Les espaces d’échanges en ligne consacrés à la santé : de nouvelles médiations de l’information de santé. In : Internet et santé, usages, acteurs et appropriations, collection santé et société (Lévy JJ, Thoër C, Eds). Québec : Presses Universitaires du Québec; 2012, pp. 57–92. ISBN: 9782760535213.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3