Religious security of the Russian Federation as a reflection object of Philosophy and Religious Studies

Author:

Zhukov Artem,Bernyukevich Tatyana

Abstract

The article is devoted to the philosophical aspects of the discourse on religious security on the territory of the Russian Federation, where religious organizations are recognized as one of the possible threats to modern society. The authors of the article prove that the specificity of threats on the part of religious organizations should be that their motive is to be a doctrine. The article justifies the fact that the commission of unlawful actions by a religious organization is most often justified not by dogma, but by material, secular motives. This leads to the fact that this activity is evaluated in accordance with the degree of harm caused as an extremist one. The novelty of the study is that the authors draw attention to the fact that there are religious associations that are recognized as dangerous, despite the fact that they do not carry out unlawful actions. The degree of danger they represent is determined on the basis of the content of religious texts that are recognized as dangerous if it can be proved that the potential threat contained in them can acquire a real character. The result of the article is the proof that the task of secular religious studies and social philosophy should not be efforts aimed at banning religious organizations that represent not a real threat, but only a potential danger, since the main thing in which these sciences are interested is the development of the theory of social adaptation of religion.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Bart R., Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics (Progress, Moscow, 1989)

2. Dvorkin A. L., Sectology: еotalitarian sects: еhe experience of systematic analysis (Christian Library, Nizhny Novgorod, 2014)

3. Levin I., Duality and popular religion in the history of Russia (Indrik, Moscow, 2004)

4. Marx K., Engels F., Works (volume 3) (State Publishing House of Political Literature, Moscow, 1962)

5. Mkrtumyan Yu. I., Basic components of ethnos culture. In Methodological problems of research of ethnic cultures. Yerevan, 1978

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3