Author:
Ait-Mouheb Nassim,Bouarfa Sami,Collard Anne-Laure,Guigui Christelle,Labille Jérôme,Lombard-Latune Rémi,Mathias Jean-Denis,Molle Bruno,Molle Pascal,Nivala Jaime,Patureau Dominique,Rapaport Alain,Roche Nicolas,Sperandio Mathieu,Tomas Severine,Harmand Jérôme
Abstract
The reuse of wastewater aims to mobilize and treat, for certain uses and under certain conditions, water that has already been used. Rather than discharging wastewater into the natural environment, this practice aims to recover it by replacing the mobilization of water withdrawn from the environment [van Loosdrecht and Brdjanovic, 2014]. By moving from a linear logic of the mobilization and use of water to a circular approach, the objective pursued is to reduce the pressure, qualitative then quantitative, on the resources while limiting, as far as possible, the usage conflicts. It is in fact a question of passing from a simple competitive mode which strongly mobilizes resources, to a complex mode, known as “circular”, of putting in complementarity of uses. This approach initially mainly concerned agricultural uses insofar as agricultural needs represent the majority of the water mobilized, including developed countries [UN Water 2018]. Cities integrate specific issues that are characterized by significantly different options from those that can be found in rural areas. In the city, the recovery of wastewater has both material aspects (water, nutrients, critical metals, biopolymers, etc.) and energy aspects (recovery of heat from the networks, production of energy by biological means and /or thermal,…) which should be integrated on an appropriate scale according to the problems addressed (housing, building, district, city, territory or hydrological basin). To study the conditions under which REUSE can develop and be implemented in a safe and sustainable manner, research is needed [Ait-Mouheb et al., 2018]. If it represents an opportunity in certain territories where wastewater can be mobilized, it is also necessary to underline the limits of this practice in territories where the wastewater discharged into the environment is necessary to maintain the low water levels of rivers and rivers, or where soils may be affected, for example, by the salinity of these waters. In addition, studies of the social, economic and environmental dimensions differ significantly depending on the uses envisaged and the situations considered. To meet these challenges, the REUSE network of INRAE (cf. www6.inrae.fr) proposes to adopt a multidisciplinary and multi-scale approach by mobilizing not only the disciplines that can be considered as falling within the field of technologies and environmental engineering but also all of those relating to the human and social sciences, economics, legal, and participatory sciences.
Reference29 articles.
1. Aichouche F., Benyahia B., Héran M. and Harmand J. (2020b) Flexibility of Waste Resource Recovery Facilities for water Reuse,” 2020 European Control Conference (ECC), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2020, pp. 570-574, doi: 10.23919/ECC51009.2020.9143734.
2. Aichouche F. (2021) Contribution of modelling and control approaches to improve the flexibility of treatment systems for REUSE of treated wastewater in agriculture, PhD Thesis, Univ. of Montpellier, defensed on the 2nd of March 2021.
3. The reuse of reclaimed water for irrigation around the Mediterranean Rim: a step towards a more virtuous cycle?
4. Environmental assessment of urine, black and grey water separation for resource recovery in a new district compared to centralized wastewater resources recovery plant
5. Optimal control of a crop irrigation model under water scarcity
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献