Author:
Kujawa Kate,Weber Jakob,Puik Erik,Paetzold Kristin
Abstract
Automotive production is faced with the challenge of bringing new products to market faster, with decreasing turn-around times, meaning production must be continually changing to accommodate new products. This paper proposes an approach to decrease a product’s time-to-market, by increasing the efficiency of automotive assembly unit design. Providing designers with conceptual information about future vehicle models early in the product design process, could shift the design start forward and enable a more efficient transition process. Large automotive companies work on vehicle design and development for years before a product is ready for production. If during these earlier stages of product design, significant changes are identified and communicated to production designers, the manufacturing system design can get a jump start with an early exploration phase. A method exists, which uses the Axiomatic Design theory to develop Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems through a modular breakdown. A similar method Adapt! employs Axiomatic Design and Scrum to develop changeable or adaptable production systems. This paper proposes to extend the Adapt! method to include an exploration phase, which through early communication, provides an overview of the required design process, and enables faster identification of the critical design challenges. A case study is performed by analysing a currently produced vehicle and its future electric version.
Reference21 articles.
1. Kuzgunkaya O., ElMaraghy H., “Economic and Strategic Justification of Changeable, Reconfigurable and Flexible Manufacturing”, Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Springer, pp 303-320, (2009)
2. Ganguli N., Burns C., Goldsberry R., Supplying the future of mobility. Deloitte, (2018). Accessed April 1, 2018. https://www2.deloitte.com
3. Stalk G., Hout T.M., Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets, Simon and Schuster (1990)
4. Zhang G., Liu R., Gong L., and Huang Q., “An Analytical Comparison on Cost and Performance among DMS, AMS, FMS and RMS”, Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and transformable factories, pp. 659-673 (2006)
5. Puik E., Ceglarek D., “Axiomatic Product Design in three Stages; A constituent roadmap that visualises the status of the design process by tracking the knowledge of the designer”, IMECE 15 (2015)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Complexity in the Kitchen;Design Engineering and Science;2021
2. Complexity in the Kitchen;MATEC Web of Conferences;2019