Affiliation:
1. Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences
Abstract
This article considers the necessity of preparing a comprehensive study, over absolute refusal grounds pertaining to functional signs set in the EU trademark law, which would meet the business community’s need to register non-traditional trade marks. The study aims to define the exact scope of the aforementioned exclusions through objective criteria that can render them a workable tool, distinct from refusal grounds pertaining to distinctiveness, and able to solve problems of overlapping rights. As its specific research methodology, the study adopts comparative results coming from the US trade dress functionality doctrine, and a specific input offered from a ‘law and economics’ perspective, including competition rules related to market definition and substitutability of products.
Publisher
Instytut Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Reference42 articles.
1. Bernatt M, Jurkowska-Gomułka A, Skoczny T, ‘Zakaz nadużywania pozycji dominującej’ [Prohibition of abuse of Dominant Position] in M Kępiński (ed), Prawo konkurencji [Competition Law] (CH Beck 2014).
2. Brancusi L, ‘Alternative Products as a Factor to Determine the Functionality of Trade Marks – How the Criteria from the US Functionality Doctrine Could be Applied in the EU Law?’ in S Frankel (ed), Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? (Edward Elgar Publishing 2019).
3. Brancusi L, ‘Assessing the Impact of Registering Non-Traditional Marks in the EU Law: A Competition Law Analysis’ in I Calboli, M Senftleben (eds), The Protection of Non-Traditional Marks: Critical Perspectives (OUP 2018) accessed 25 Feb 2020.
4. Brancusi L, ‘Funkcjonalność techniczna i estetyczna jako przeszkoda rejestracji’ [Technical and Aesthetic Functionality as a Registration Impediment] in R Skubisz (ed), Znaki towarowe i ich ochrona [Trade Marks and Their Protection] (CH Beck 2019).
5. Calboli I, ‘The Role of Comparative Legal Analysis in Intellectual Property Law: From Good to Great?’ in G Dinwoodie (ed), Methods and Perspectives in Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar 2013).