A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk

Author:

Reilly Gerard P1,Gregory David A2,Scotti Dennis J3,Lederman Samuel4,Neiman Wade A5,Sussman Steven6,M Bean Lisa7,Ekono Mercedes M2

Affiliation:

1. Axia Women’s Health, Cincinnati, OH 45255, USA

2. Baker Tilly US, LLP, New York, NY 10119, USA

3. Emeritus Professor of Healthcare & Life Sciences Management, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, NJ 07940, USA

4. Altus Research, Lake Worth, FL 33461, USA

5. Women’s Health Services of Central Virginia, Lynchburg, VA 24502, USA

6. Capital Health & Lawrence Clinical Research, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA

7. Innercare, El Centro, CA 92243, USA

Abstract

Aim: This largest-of-its-kind study evaluated the clinical utility of CA125 and OVA1, commonly used as ovarian tumor markers for assessing the risk of malignancy. The research focused on the ability and utility of these tests to reliably predict patients at low risk for ovarian cancer. Clinical utility endpoints were 12-month maintenance of benign mass status, reduction in gynecologic oncologist referral, avoidable surgical intervention and associated cost savings. Materials   & methods: This was a multicenter retrospective review of data from electronic medical records and administrative claims databases. Patients receiving a CA125 or OVA1 test between October 2018 and September 2020 were identified and followed for 12 months using site-specific electronic medical records to assess tumor status and utilization outcomes. Propensity score adjustment was used to control for confounding variables. Payer allowed amounts from Merative MarketScan Research Databases were used to estimate 12-month episode-of-care costs per patient, including surgery and other interventions. Results: Among 290 low-risk OVA1 patients, 99.0% remained benign for 12 months compared with 97.2% of 181 low-risk CA125 patients. The OVA1 cohort exhibited 75% lower odds of surgical intervention in the overall sample of patients (Adjusted OR: 0.251, p ≤ 0.0001), and 63% lower odds of gynecologic oncologist utilization among premenopausal women (Adjusted OR: 0.37, p = 0.0390) versus CA125. OVA1 demonstrated significant savings in surgical interventions ($2486, p ≤ 0.0001) and total episode-of-care costs ($2621, p ≤ 0.0001) versus CA125. Conclusion: This study underscores the utility of a reliably predictive multivariate assay for assessing ovarian cancer risk. For patients assessed at low risk of ovarian tumor malignancy, OVA1 is associated with a significant reduction in avoidable surgeries and substantial cost savings per patient. OVA1 is also associated with a significant reduction in subspecialty referrals for low-risk premenopausal patients.

Publisher

Becaris Publishing Limited

Subject

Health Policy

Reference18 articles.

1. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance. Statistics. http://www.ocrfa.org/members/about-ovarian-cancer/statistics/

2. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018;Torre LA;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2018

3. Adnexal mass risk assessment: a multivariate index assay for malignancy risk stratification;Zhang Z;Future Oncol.,2019

4. First international consensus report on adnexal masses: management recommendations: international consensus on adnexal masses;Glanc P;J. Ultrasound Med.,2017

5. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER). National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: ovarian cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3