Cost of disease progression among US patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Author:

Lam Clara1ORCID,Diessner Brandon2ORCID,Andrade Katherine2ORCID,Stackland Sydnie2,Park Leah1,Mehta Sandhya3,Lin Feng3ORCID,Kwong Winghan Jackie3

Affiliation:

1. AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA

2. Optum Life Sciences, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA

3. Daiichi–Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA

Abstract

Aim: The objectives were to investigate the differences in per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who experience disease progression in 12 months compared with those who don't investigate the impact of progression timing on cumulative healthcare costs. Patients & methods: This claims-based study included patients diagnosed with mBC between 1 January 2013 and 30 April 2020 and received HER2-targeted therapy. Patients were categorized as progressed or nonprogressed. For objective one, monthly HCRU and costs were assessed for up to two lines of therapy (LOTs). Data were summarized descriptively and compared using a generalized linear model (GLM). For objective two, patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were assessed and cumulative healthcare costs were estimated in the 3 years following the start of LOT1 or LOT2 using a GLM and Kaplan–Meier weighting. Results: Among the 4113 patients in the study sample, 3406 had at least 12 months of follow-up (or less if due to death). Compared with nonprogressed patients, progressed patients had higher mean PPPM healthcare costs (LOT1: $22,014 vs $18,372, p < 0.001; LOT2: $19,643 vs $16,863, p = 0.001), and HCRU, including number of emergency room visits and inpatient stays (both p < 0.001) in the 12 months following LOT start. Progressed patients had higher 3-year mean cumulative healthcare costs than nonprogressed patients following LOT1 and LOT2 and this difference was greater for patients who progressed earlier. Conclusion: Disease progression was associated with significant increases in HCRU and costs. Delays in progression were associated with lower cumulative healthcare costs. Earlier use of more clinically effective treatments to delay progression may reduce the economic burden among these patients.

Publisher

Becaris Publishing Limited

Reference32 articles.

1. Breastcancer.org. Key Statistics for Breast Cancer (2023). (Accessed 13 March 2023). https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer

2. Comparison of treatment costs for breast cancer, by tumor stage and type of service;Blumen H;Am. Health Drug Benefits,2016

3. Projecting the prevalence and costs of metastatic breast cancer from 2015 through 2030;Gogate A;JNCI Cancer Spectr.,2021

4. The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers;Burstein HJ;N. Engl. J. Med.,2005

5. Current and future management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer;Martínez-Sáez O;JCO Oncol. Pract.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3