COVID-19 clinical trials: who is likely to participate and why?

Author:

Fisher Kimberly A12ORCID,Epstein Mara M1,Nguyen Ngoc1,Fouayzi Hassan1,Crawford Sybil3,Linas Benjamin P4,Mazor Kathleen M1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Health Systems Science, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

2. Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

3. Tan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

4. Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, & Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Abstract

Aim: To identify factors associated with willingness to participate in a COVID-19 clinical trial and reasons for and against participating. Materials & methods: We surveyed Massachusetts (MA, USA) residents online using the Dynata survey platform and via phone using random digit dialing between October and November 2021. Respondents were asked to imagine they were hospitalized with COVID-19 and invited to participate in a treatment trial. We assessed willingness to participate by asking, “Which way are you leaning” and why. We used multivariate logistic regression to model factors associated with leaning toward participation. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Of 1071 respondents, 65.6% leaned toward participating. Multivariable analyses revealed college-education (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.27), trust in the healthcare system (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.58) and relying on doctors (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.45, 2.17) and family or friends (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.54) to make health decisions were significantly associated with leaning toward participating. Respondents with lower health literacy (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91) and who identify as Black (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.68), Hispanic (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.98), or republican (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.97) were significantly less likely to lean toward participating. Common reasons for participating included helping others, benefitting oneself and deeming the study low risk. Common reasons for leaning against were deeming the study high risk, disliking experimental treatments and not wanting to be a guinea pig. Conclusion: Our finding that vulnerable individuals and those with lower levels of trust in the healthcare system are less likely to be receptive to participating in a COVID-19 clinical trial highlights that work is needed to achieve a healthcare system that provides confidence to historically disadvantaged groups that their participation in research will benefit their community.

Publisher

Becaris Publishing Limited

Reference37 articles.

1. NIH Revitalization Act Subtitle B Part 1 Sec 131–133 June 10 1993. https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sites/orwh/files/docs/NIH-Revitalization-Act-1993.pdf (2023).

2. Food and Drug Administration. FDA action plan to enhance the collection and availability of demographic subgroup data. In: Dept of Health and Human Services, ed2014. https://www.fda.gov/media/89307/download

3. Food and Drug Administration. Diversity plans to improve enrollment of participants from underrepresented racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials; Draft guidance for industry; Availability. In: Dept of Health and Human Services, ed2022. Docket number FDA-2021-D-0789. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/diversity-plans-improve-enrollment-participants-underrepresented-racial-and-ethnic-populations

4. Racial and ethnic disparities among participants in precision oncology clinical studies;Aldrighetti CM;JAMA Netw. Open,2021

5. Disparity of race reporting and representation in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018;Loree JM;JAMA Oncol.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3