One size does not fit all: community views on choices for TB treatment and prevention

Author:

Makone A.1,Angami K.2,Bhattacharya D.3,Frick M.4,Castillo J. G.5,Herrera R.6,McKenna L.3,Moses G. K.6,Rucsineanu O.7,Sari A. H.6,Stillo J.8,Agbassi P.6

Affiliation:

1. Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa;, Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;

2. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, Access to Rights and Knowledge Foundation, Kohima

3. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, Survivors Against TB, New Delhi, India;

4. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, Treatment Action Group, New York, NY;

5. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA;

6. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;

7. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, Moldova National Association of Tuberculosis Patients “SMIT” (Society of Moldova against Tuberculosis), Chis¸ina˘u, Moldova;

8. Global TB Community Advisory Board, New York, NY, USA;, Department of Anthropology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

Abstract

Treatment and prevention paradigms in TB have been dominated by a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, in which all persons are given the same treatment regimens. This stands in contrast to other health conditions, where differentiated models of care have been shown to be effective. In this Viewpoint, we make the case for considering multiple factors when deciding which regimens should be offered to people with TB infection and disease. Choice about which regimens to use should be made in conjunction with people who have TB and consider efficacy, safety, duration, pill burden, formulation, drug interactions, time spent in monitoring, drug susceptibility, compatibility with other areas of life, and availability of support services. Ideally, these choices should be considered within an equity framework with the most intensified services being offered to those considered most vulnerable.

Publisher

International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3