Community- vs. hospital-based management of multidrug-resistant TB in Pakistan

Author:

Fatima R.1,Yaqoob A.2,Qadeer E.3,Khan M. A.4,Ghafoor A.5,Jamil B.1,Haq M. U.6,Ahmed N.7,Baig S.7,Rehman A.8,Abbasi Q.9,Khan A. W.5,Ikram A.10,Hicks J. P.11,Walley J.11

Affiliation:

1. Common Management Unit (TB, HIV/AIDS and Malaria), Islamabad, Pakistan

2. Common Management Unit (TB, HIV/AIDS and Malaria), Islamabad, Pakistan, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

3. Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

4. Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan

5. National TB Control Program, Islamabad, Pakistan

6. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, National TB Control Program, Islamabad, Pakistan

7. Ojha Institute of Chest Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan

8. Gulab Devi Chest Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

9. TB Samli Sanatorium Hospital, Murree, Pakistan

10. National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan

11. Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK

Abstract

BACKGROUND Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) treatment takes 18–24 months and is complex, costly and isolating. We provide trial evidence on the WHO Pakistan recommendation for community-based care rather than hospital-based care.METHODS Two-arm, parallel-group, superiority trial was conducted in three programmatic management of drug-resistant TB hospitals in Punjab and Sindh Provinces, Pakistan. We enrolled 425 patients with MDR-TB aged >15 years through block randomisation in community-based care (1-week hospitalisation) or hospital-based care (2 months hospitalisation). Primary outcome was treatment success.RESULTS Among 425 patients with MDR-TB, 217 were allocated to community-based care and 208 to hospital-based care. Baseline characteristics were similar between the community and hospitalised arms, as well as in selected sites. Treatment success was 74.2% (161/217) under community-based care and 67.8% (141/208) under hospital-based care, giving a covariate-adjusted risk difference (community vs. hospital model) of 0.06 (95% CI –0.02 to 0.15; P = 0.144).CONCLUSIONS We found no clear evidence that community-based care was more or less effective than hospital-based care model. Given the other substantial advantages of community-based care over hospital based (e.g., more patient-friendly and accessible, with lower treatment costs), this supports the adoption of the community-based care model, as recommended by the WHO.

Publisher

International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3