Stem Geometry Recommendation for Total Hip Replacement Planning Using Computed Tomography Data Analysis
-
Published:2022-03-28
Issue:
Volume:55
Page:23-34
-
ISSN:2296-9845
-
Container-title:Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JBBBE
Author:
Safitri Pramestia Nur1, Amelia 1, Asmaria Talitha2ORCID, Rahma Osmalina Nur1, Rahyussalim Ahmad Jabir3, Aurellia Salsabila4, Kartika Ika2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Airlangga University 2. Indonesian Institute of Sciences 3. Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital 4. University of Indonesia
Abstract
Total Hip Replacement (THR) requires careful planning preparation, especially in the geometry suitability between the patient's bone and the implant. If it is applied incorrectly, it will be dangerous for the patient, such as the risk of complications, dislocation, and re-surgery. This paper aims to compare the size of the patient's THR geometry as a basis for consideration in implant designs to minimize the risk of harm after implantation. This study was limited to male patients only. The computed tomography scanning data (CT-Scan data) in the lower abdomen, segmented to hip joint area belonging to the American race and an Indonesian male, were compared. The comparison indicates that the American race data has a greater dimension than Indonesian. The American hip bone geometry result is following the standard modern implant by Johnson and Johnson size. By all analysis, the fittest geometry for the Indonesian male patient needs to adjust and has a smaller size than the commercial implant. This study finally recommends the specific length of the femoral stem for the optimal THR implant with the parameter values of Femoral Head Offset, Neck Length, Neck Shaft Angle, Mediolateral Width 1, Mediolateral Width 2, Mediolateral Width 3 respectively for the right THR, namely 37.9; 31.6; 134.3; 43.1; 13.62; 12.36; while the left THR is 38.9; 31.7; 134.5; 43.1; 13.70; 12.4 in mm. Overall, the precise implant planning based on real patient conditions and anthropometry is necessary to match implants and bone anatomy.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference31 articles.
1. M.R. Safran, Microinstability of the Hip - Gaining Acceptance,, J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., vol. 27, no. 1, p.12–22, 2019,. 2. K. Atmojo, Prediction of Von Mises Femoral Stem Voltage in Artificial Hip Bone Joints using the Finite Element Method,, Diponegoro University, (2011). 3. J.H.M. Goosen, B.J. Kollen, R.M. Castelein, B.M. Kuipers, and C.C. Verheyen, Minimally Invasive versus Classic Procedures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial,, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., vol. 469, no. 1, p.200–208, Jan. 2011,. 4. B. R. Rawal, R. Ribeiro, R. Malhotra, and N. Bhatnagar, Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population,, Indian J. Orthop., vol. 46, no. 1, p.46–53, 2012,. 5. M. C. Gallo et al., Limb Length Discrepancy in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Lesser Trochanter a Reliable Measure of Leg Length?,, J. Arthroplasty, no. June, 2021,.
|
|