Simulation of the Response of Multi-Story Buildings with Concrete-Silica Fume and Concrete-Liquid Carbon Dioxide-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Simulation of the Response of Multi-Story Buildings with Concrete-Silica Fume and Concrete-Liquid Carbon Dioxide

Published:2023-03-02 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1662-0356
Container-title:Science and Technology Applications
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Nasution Budiman¹,Nasution Habibi Azka²,Amdani Kahirul¹,Kadri Muhammad¹,Sari Silvia Dona¹,Barus Eviyona Laurenta Br¹,Nst Dina Alfariza¹,Suryani Laili¹,Afala Iswari¹

Affiliation:

1. Universitas Negeri Medan

2. Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia

Abstract

Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) used in building structures has a negative impact. The presence of CO2 emissions produced becomes very dangerous. To reduce this impact, materials that are more environmentally friendly are used. Silica Fume and liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) are among them. In this study, silica fume and liquid carbon dioxide were used as a substitute for cement. The effect of the stiffness of the two materials and the earthquake lateral load was tested by looking at the response of the high-rise building. Through numerical simulations, we compare the mode shape, displacement of the structure, and the sheer force experienced by the structure.

Publisher

Trans Tech Publications Ltd

Link

https://www.scientific.net/AST.126.3.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Kong D L Y and Sanjayan J G: Damage Behavior of Geopolymer Composites Exposed to Elevated Temperatures (Cement and Concrete Composites vol 4) (United Kingdom: Elsevier) issue 10 p.986 – 991 (2008).

2. Daniel A J, Sivakamasundari S and Nishanth A: Study on Partial Replacement of Silica Fume Based Geopolymer Concrete Beam Behavior under Torsion (Procedia Engineering vol 173) (Netherlands: Elsevier) p.732 – 739 (2017).

3. M Julian et al: Options for Achieving a 50% Cut in Industrial Carbon Emissions by 2050 (Environ. Sci. Technol. vol 44) p.1888 – 1894 (2010).

4. P. Friedlingstein et al: Update on CO2 Emissions (Nature Geoscience vol 3) p.811 – 812 (2010).

5. McLellan B C et al: Costs and carbon emissions for Geopolymer pastes in comparison to Ordinary Portland Cement (Journal of Cleaner Production vol 19) (Japan: Elsevier) issue 9-10 p.1080 – 1090 (2011).