Effectiveness of Two Type Coupling Agent of Dental Composite Nanofiller Prototype with Addition of Acetone in Preparation
-
Published:2018-10
Issue:
Volume:782
Page:244-249
-
ISSN:1662-9795
-
Container-title:Key Engineering Materials
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:KEM
Author:
Karlina Elin1, Djustiana Nina1, Febrida Renny1, Faza Yanwar1, Seniyah 2, Panatarani Camellia2, Joni I Made2
Affiliation:
1. Padjadjaran University 2. Universitas Padjadjaran
Abstract
Nano size of ceramic filler (nanofiller) are tend to possess difficulties to be covered by resin matrix due to large surface area to volume ratio. Addition of aceton known as the diluent agent by introducing more content of filler as well as helping distribution of the filler in the resin matrix in application of dental composite restoration. In this study, a total 24 specimens of dental composite prototype; nanofiller-TMPS and nanofiller-MPTS were prepared using a customized acrylic mold and they were divided into two groups based on filler/resin ratio (n=6 each group). In the process of dental composite making, acetone were added into resin; 1 ml (filler/resin, 50/50) and 5 ml (filler/resin, 80/20) untill specific consistency obtained. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C then subjected to hardness test using Vickers hardness tester machine, LECO – Japan M– 400–H1 with the load of 200 grams for 15 seconds (ADA Specification No. 27). Data were statistically analyzed using t independent test (α=0.05). The result revealed that dental composite prototype contain nanofiller-MPTS with filler/resin rasio (50/50) were statistically significant higher than dental composite prototype contain nanofiller-TMPS with same ratio (p<0.05). Otherwise, dental composite prototype with filler/resin ratio (80/20) were no observed statistically significant differences for both nanofiller-TMPS and nanofiller-MPTS (p>0.05). As conclusion, nanofiller modified MPTS are more effective to elevate surface hardness of dental composite prototype than nanofiller-TMPS for 50/50 filler/resin ratio
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference17 articles.
1. Craig, R.G., W.J. O'Brien and J.M. Powers. 2002. Dental Materials Properties and Manipulation. 11th ed. St. Louis. Mosby-YearBook, Inc. Pp. 68-124, 232-257. 2. Randolph, Luc D., Palin, W.M., Leloup, G., and Leprince, J.G. 2016. Filler Characteristics of Modern Dental Resin Composites and Their Influence on Physico Mechanical Properties. Belgium. Journal Dental Material. 2850:1-14. 3. Mota, E.G., Adriano, W., Spohr, A.M., Oshima, H.M.S., and Carvalho, L.M.N. 2011. Relationship Between Filler Content and Selected Mechanichal Properties of Six Microhybrid Composite. Brazil. 26(2):151-155. 4. Djustiana, Nina., Hasratiningsih, Z., Karlina, E., Febrida, R., Takarini, V., Cahyanto, A., Hardiansyah, A., and Sunendar, B. 2016. Hardness Evaluation of Dental Composite with Ceramic Fillers. Key Engineering Materials. 696:74-79. 5. Chen, Liang., Yu Qingsong; Wang Yong; and Haoli. 2011. BisGMA/TEGDMA Dental Composite Containing High Aspect Ratio Hydroxyapatite Nanofibers. United States. Journal Dental Material. 27(11):1187-1195.
|
|