Abstract
The real-time pitch shifting process is widely used in various types of music production. The pitch shifting technology can be divided into two major types, the time domain type and the frequency domain type. Compared with the time domain method, the frequency domain method has the advantage of large shifting scale, low total cost of computing and the more flexibility of the algorithm. However, the use of Fourier Transform in frequency domain processing leads to the inevitable inherent frequency leakage effects which decrease the accuracy of the pitch shifting effect. In order to restrain the side effect of Fourier Transform, window functions are used to fall down the spectrum-aliasing. In practical processing, Haimming Window and Blackman Window are frequently used. In this paper, we compare both the effect of the two window functions in the restraint of frequency leakage and the performance and accuracy in subjective based on the traditional phase vocoder[1]. Experiment shows that Haimming Window is generally better than Blackman Window in pitch shifting process.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference12 articles.
1. J. Laroche, Time and pitch scale modification of audio signals, in Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics,M. Kahrs and K. Brandenburg, Eds. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, (1998).
2. J.L. Flanagan and R.M. Golden, Phase vocoder, Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 45, p.1493–1509, Nov (1966).
3. J. B. Allen and L. R. rabiner, A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis and synthesis, Proc. IEEE, vol. 65, no. 11, p.1558–1564, Nov. (1977).
4. R. Portnoff, Time-scale modifications of speech based on short-time Fourier analysis, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 29, no. 3, p.374–390, (1981).
5. M.S. Puckette, Phase-locked vocoder, in Proc. IEEE ASSPWorkshop on app. of sig. proc. to audio and acous., New Paltz, NY, (1995).