Affiliation:
1. Addis Ababa Science and Technology University
2. Ulm University
3. Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Abstract
In this paper, a modified adaptive K-means (MAKM) method is proposed to extract the region of interest (ROI) from the local and public datasets. The local image datasets are collected from Bethezata General Hospital (BGH) and the public datasets are from Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS). The same image number is used for both datasets, 112 are abnormal and 208 are normal. Two texture features (GLCM and Gabor) from ROIs and one CNN based extracted features are considered in the experiment. CNN features are extracted using Inception-V3 pre-trained model after simple preprocessing and cropping. The quality of the features are evaluated individually and by fusing features to one another and five classifiers (SVM, KNN, MLP, RF, and NB) are used to measure the descriptive power of the features using cross-validation. The proposed approach was first evaluated on the local dataset and then applied to the public dataset. The results of the classifiers are measured using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, kappa, computation time and AUC. The experimental analysis made using GLCM features from the two datasets indicates that GLCM features from BGH dataset outperformed that of MIAS dataset in all five classifiers. However, Gabor features from the two datasets scored the best result with two classifiers (SVM and MLP). For BGH and MIAS, SVM scored an accuracy of 99%, 97.46%, the sensitivity of 99.48%, 96.26% and specificity of 98.16%, 100% respectively. And MLP achieved an accuracy of 97%, 87.64%, the sensitivity of 97.40%, 96.65% and specificity of 96.26%, 75.73% respectively. Relatively maximum performance is achieved for feature fusion between Gabor and CNN based extracted features using MLP classifier. However, KNN, MLP, RF, and NB classifiers achieved almost 100% performance for GLCM texture features and SVM scored an accuracy of 96.88%, the sensitivity of 97.14% and specificity of 96.36%. As compared to other classifiers, NB has scored the least computation time in all experiments.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference5 articles.
1. World Health Rankings, http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/, Accessed on April, (2017).
2. A.Oliver Malagelada, Automatic Mass Segmentation in Mammographic Images. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat De Girona, Catalonia, Spain (2007a).
3. Mammographic Image Analysis Homepage: Signs of Diseases http://www.mammoimage.org/signs-of-disease/ Accessed on Nov.02.(2015).
4. Mehul P. Sampat, Mia K. Markey, Alan C. Bovik, Handbook of Image and Video Processing: Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington (2005).
5. J Suckling et al., The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database Exerpta Medica, International Congress Series 1069(1994)375-378.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献