Affiliation:
1. Universiti Putra Malaysia
Abstract
The paper focuses on applying optimal control solutions to combined energy storage and attitude control system (CEACS) under different reference missions. In previous researches, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control method, the PID-active force control method and H2 control were tested for CEACS and achieved its mission requirement. However, problems such as the in-orbit system uncertainties affect the PID control performances. Thus, two optimal control methods, H2 and H∞ controls are proposed and tested on CEACS under different mission scenarios to improve its pitch attitude accuracy. Results show that both H2 and H∞ are able to achieve the reference mission requirement even under the influence of uncertainties (non-ideal). Moreover comparison between H2 and H∞ shows the H2 is a better control option for CEACS in terms of disturbance rejection.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference15 articles.
1. R. Varatharajoo, R. Kahle, A review of spacecraft conventional and synergistic systems, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology , Vol. 77, No. 2 (2005), pp.131-141.
2. C.M. Roithmayr, International space station attitude control and energy storage experiment: effects of flywheel torque, NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA/TM-1999-209100 (Feb 1999).
3. P. Tsiotras, H. Shen, and C. Hall, Satellite attitude control and power tracking with energy/momentum wheels, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 24 (2001), pp.23-34.
4. R. Varatharajoo, S. Fasoulas, Methodology for the Development of Combined Energy and Attitude Control Systems for Satellites, J. Aerospace Science & Technology, Vol. 6 (2002), pp.303-311.
5. R. Varatharajoo, N. Filipski, Attitude performance of the spacecraft combined energy and attitude control system, J. British Interplanetary Society - BIS, Vol. 57 (2004), pp.237-241.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献