Affiliation:
1. Università degli Studi di Palermo
2. Università degli Studi Palermo
Abstract
Building occupants are important factor in giving information on indoor conditions such as comfort, productivity, building performance and occupants ́ health. Even that, being their appraisal mainly based on subjective judgments, it is difficult to set up a standard and objective method for this purpose. The present work aimed to describe, analyze and compare the most common tests on this topic, in order to highlight critical, failings and strengths.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference7 articles.
1. W. Preiser. The evolution of post occupancy evaluation. In: Federal Facilities Council, editor. Learning from our buildings. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; (2001).
2. M. Trapanese, V. Franzitta, A. Viola, D. Milone, A. Milone. A Case Study to the Evaluation of Global Environmental Quality, Concerning Thermal, Acoustic and Atmospheric Conditions of Urban Areas. Advanced Materials Research 726, 1068-1072.
3. M. Trapanese, V. Franzitta, G. Ciulla, V. Lo Brano, A. Viola. An Approach to Rank Noise Pollution in Workplaces. Advanced Materials Research 726, 3132-3136.
4. V. Franzitta, D. Milone, A. Viola, M. Trapanese. A procedure to evaluate the indoor global quality by a sub objective-objective procedure. Advanced Materials Research 734, 3065-3070.
5. POE. Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings. IEA International Energy Agency. A Report of IEA SHC TASK 21 / ECBCS ANNEX 29. byStaffanHygge and Hans Allan Löfberg KTH-Royal Institute of Technology Centre for Built Environment Gävle, Sweden December (1999).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献