Affiliation:
1. Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM)
Abstract
This research was conducted to provide a feasible method for reconstructing the 3D model of mandibular bone to undergo finite element analysis to investigate von Mises stress, deformation and shear stress located at the cortical bone, cancellous one and neck implant of the proposed dental implant design. Dental implant has become a significant remedial approach but although the success rate is high, the fixture failure may happen when there are insufficient host tissues to initiate and sustain the osseointegration. Computerised Tomography scan was conducted to generate head images for bone reconstruction process. MIMICS software and 3-matic software were used to develop the 3D mandibular model. The reconstructed mandibular model was then assembled with five different 3D models of dental implants. Feasible boundary conditions and material properties were assigned to the developed muscle areas and joints. The highest performance design with the best responses was the design B with the value for the von Mises stress for the neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone were 7.53 MPa, 16.91 MPa and 1.34 MPa respectively. The values for the maximum of micromotion for the neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone of design B were 20.60 μm, 21.17 μm and 5.83 μm respectively. Shear stress for neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone for this design were 0.15 MPa, 4.74 MPa and 1.54 MPa respectively. The design with a cone shaped hole which is design B was the proper design when compared with other designs in terms of von Misses stress, deformations and shear stress.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference34 articles.
1. S. Standring, The anatomical basis of clinical practice, 41st ed. Elsevier, (2005).
2. J. H. Keyak, J. M. Meagher, H. B. Skinner, and C. D. Mote, Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method,, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, p.389–397, (1990).
3. G. J. Pruim, H. J. de Jongh, and J. J. ten Bosch, Forces acting on the mandible during bilateral static bite at different bite force levels,, Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 13, no. 9, p.755–763, (1980).
4. S. A. Hadi, N. Ashfaq, A. Bey, and S. Khan, Biological factors responsible for failure of osseointegration in oral implants,, Biology and Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, p.164–170, (2011).
5. Implants are The Clear Choice for Teeth Replacement., [Online]. Available: http://www.midwestdentalassociates.net/implant-dentist-aurora.html. [Accessed: 18-Oct-2014].