Abstract
Structural robustness as a property of structural systems has gained renewed following several recent failures, where the consequences were disproportionate to the initating image. There have been some methods developed towards quantifying robustness or vulnerability and achieving greater robustness in structures recently but they remain scattered. In this paper, basis for the development of measures to quantify structural robustness are formulated. Various approaches for quantifying robustness are distinguished into measures based on structural behaviors and structural attributes of systems. It is shown that measures based on structural behaviors often seem to be expressive but require complex calculation. Measures based on structural attributes are usually calculable while their expressiveness is not yet adequate. Different types of structure which have a tendency for different types of collapse can be described favorably by different measures of robustness.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference5 articles.
1. U. Starossek, M. Haberland, Measures of Structural Robustness – Requirements & Applications, ASCE SEI 2008 Structures Congress, Vancouver, Canada, April 24-26 (2008).
2. T.D.G. Canisius, J. D. Sorensen, Robustness of structural systems– a new focus for the Joint Committee on Structural Safety, Proceding: Application of Statistics and Probability in Civil (2007).
3. J. D. Sorensen, Framework for robustness assessment of timber structures, Engineering Structures. 33 (2011) 3088 -3089.
4. J.W. Baker, M. Schubert, M.H. Faber, On the assessment of robustness, Structural Safety. 30 (2008) 253-267.
5. U. Starossek, M. Haberland, Evaluating Measures of Structural Robustness, Structures 2009: Don't Mess with Structural Engineering. (2009)1758-1765.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献