Simulation Based Multi-Criteria Assessment of Lean Material Flow Design Alternatives

Author:

Roessler Markus Philipp1,Abele Eberhard1,Metternich Joachim1

Affiliation:

1. Technical University Darmstadt

Abstract

In this article a procedure is introduced to improve transparency and reliability of results for the selection of material flow design alternatives including machine tools and other capital-intensive goods. In the design phase of material flow planning projects, key performance indicators (KPIs) for design alternatives including processing as well as intralogistics elements can be derived using simulation. Using the state of the art method in value stream design and simulation often volatile input data is taken into account only in the simulation itself, but not in the downstream comparison of alternative designs, which could lead to imprecise conclusions and therefore to wrong investment decisions. To overcome this issue and to consider variability in the whole simulation phase and a subsequent decision making process, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) with two fuzzy representations is proposed and discussed here with the aim of helping practitioners to get more competitive value streams. A further goal of the article is the comparison between both forms used for fuzzy representation. Using the design example of machine tool-intralogistics systems obtained results are discussed.

Publisher

Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.

Reference21 articles.

1. Behrend, A; Abele, E; Emrich, A (2007). Together - one after another – cellular manufacturing as an economic alternative for complete machining (in German). Werkstatt und Betrieb 12, p.68–72.

2. Womack, J; Jones, D; Roos, D (1990). The machine that changed the world. Free Press, New York.

3. Roessler, M; Wolff, M; Abele, E (2013). Design and simulation based assessment of lean material flows considering imprecision. 6th MCPL Conference. Fortaleza, Brazil, September 11-13, (2013).

4. Sturm, F; Muetze-Niewoehner, S; Gaertner, T; Schreiber, S; Gregorius, C; Werkle, M (2009). Growth through change to solution providers (in German). Werkstattstechnik online 7-8, p.518–525.

5. Detty, R; Yingling, J (2000). Quantifying benefits of conversion to lean manufacturing with discrete event simulation. A case study. Journal of Production Research 38(2), p.429–445.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3