Affiliation:
1. North China Electric Power University
2. Electric Power Research Institute
Abstract
The integrity, objectivity and science of the evaluation index system will be directly related to the accuracy of the evaluation results. However, studies on the quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of the simulation model are not still perfect, comprehensive, and links between relevant literatures are not close enough. The main thing is the lack of systematic summary of the theoretical literatures. Therefore, this paper is summarized in three aspects, the research results, indices classification and their respective advantages and disadvantages, the applicable range of indicators.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference21 articles.
1. Renmu He. Research into veracity of power system dynamic simulation[J]. Power System Technology, 2000, 24(12): 1-4(in Chinese).
2. Cheng Zhou and Renmu He. Assessment on simulation a accuracy of power system component models[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(14): 12-15(in Chinese).
3. Huang Z Y, Kosterev M and Guttromson R. Model validation with hybrid dynamic simulation[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2006, Montreal, Canada, (2006).
4. Huang Z, Guttromson R and Hauer J. Large-scale hybrid dynamic simulation employing field measurements[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004, Denver, USA, (2004).
5. Pereira L, Undrill J and Kosterev D. A new thermal governor modeling approach in the WECC[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2): 819-829.