Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Abstract
This paper continues series of papers devoted to verification of discrete-continual finite element method (DCFEM) for two-dimensional problems of structural analysis. Formulation of the problem for deep beam with piecewise constant physical and geometrical parameters along so-called its basic direction, solutions obtained by DCFEM and finite element method (FEM) /with the use of ANSYS Mechanical/, their comparison are presented. It was confirmed that DCFEM is more effective in the most critical, vital, potentially dangerous areas of structure in terms of fracture (areas of the so-called edge effects), where some components of solution are rapidly changing functions and their rate of change in many cases can’t be adequately taken into account by the standard FEM.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Reference13 articles.
1. K. Lawrence, in: ANSYS Tutorial Release 14, SDC Publications (2012).
2. W.A. Al-Tabey, in: Finite Element Analysis in Mechanical Design Using ANSYS: Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Handbook for Mechanical Engineers with ANSYS Tutorials, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (2012).
3. E.J. Barbero, in: Finite Element Analysis of Composite Materials Using ANSYS, CRC Press (2013).
4. S. Moaveni, in: Finite Element Analysis: Theory and Application with ANSYS, Prentice Hall (2014).
5. T.A. Stolarski, N. Nakasone and S. Yoshimoto, in: Engineering Analysis with ANSYS Software, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann (2011).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献