Affiliation:
1. Chaoyang University of Technology
2. Xie Sheng Engineering Consultants
Abstract
Double-symmetry I-beams are the most common beam cross-sections in structural building. Because that is simpler to design and analyze steel profiles than single-symmetry I-beams. However, with the advancement of economy, the improvement of the quality of life and the cultural standards, large-scale emergence of various large span bridges, special bridge-type landscapes and viaducts. Single symmetrical I-section is better than Double-symmetry I-section to fairly in line with demand characteristics and material economy. This study chooses different Iyc/Iy ratio sections, 0.229, 0.23, 0.3 and 0.5. Iyc/Iy =0.23 is the change point of the sudden drop of the strength of the compressed airfoil. In study, the section is divided into three sections of plasticity, inelasticity and elasticity for analysis and comparison. Considering the different section sizes. If the value of Lb for a small non-elastic interval is too large, the section with a smaller cross-section will reach the elastic interval. Taking all section conditions Lb into consideration, taking 1.4m as a section will reach the non-elastic interval, if the value of the longer Lb is too small, the section with the larger section does not reach the elastic interval. In study, 10m is taken as the section to reach the elastic interval, orientation the AISC ( 2017 ) specification is used to analyze the I-beam. Symmetrical wing plate cross-sections were increased and reduced. The strength of the cross-sections between the compressed side and the tensioned side was discussed, and a single-symmetric I-section with the best cross-sectional efficiency was proposed.
Publisher
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science
Reference10 articles.
1. V.Z. Vlasov, Thin-walled elastic bars, Israel Program for Scientifc Translations, Jerusalem, (1961).
2. D.A. Nethercot, in: The Effective Lengths of Cantilevers as Governed by Lateral Buckling, The Institution of Structural Engineers, Vol.51, NO.5, pp.161-168. (1973).
3. A. Andradea, D. Camotim, P. Providência e Costa, in: On the evaluation of elastic critical moments in doubly and singly symmetric I-section cantilevers, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol.63, No.7, pp.894-908. (2007).
4. Taras, Andreas, Greiner, Richard, in: New design curves for lateral torsional buckling—Proposal based on a consistent derivation, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol.66(5), pp.648-663. (2010).
5. Jankowska-Sandberg, Joanna, Kołodziej, Jarosław, in: Experimental study of steel truss lateral–torsional buckling, Engineering Structures, Vol.46, pp.165-172. (2013).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献