METHODS OF SEMANTIC ANALYSIS IN ANNOTATED GENERALIZATION OF TEXT DOCUMENTS-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

METHODS OF SEMANTIC ANALYSIS IN ANNOTATED GENERALIZATION OF TEXT DOCUMENTS

Published:2017-03-23 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:53-58
ISSN:2707-2371
Container-title:Computer systems and network
language:
Short-container-title:СSN

Author:

O. Ocherklevich, ,A. Ihnatovych

Abstract

The article is devoted to the use of semantic analysis in the generalization of text documents. The analysis of features of the most widespread methods of generalization of text documents and an estimation of quality of results of an estimation is carried out. Features of the improved method of annotative generalization of text documents, which uses the principles of hidden semantic analysis and elements of fuzzy logic to identify semantically important sentences, are presented. It is proposed to use a new approach to evaluating the effectiveness of generalization, based on elements of fuzzy logic and a statistical indicator used to assess the importance of words in the context and class of the document, which allows to determine the correspondence between the original document and its summary. The results of verification of the proposed tools, certifying their effectiveness. Keywords: text document, annotation generalization, semantic analysis, fuzzy logic, evaluation, efficiency

Publisher

Lviv Polytechnic National University

Reference10 articles.

1. 1. Ahmad K., Vrusias B. PCF Oliveira: Final evaluation and categorization of the text. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM SIGIR International Conference on Information Search Research and Development, Toronto, Canada, 2003, pp. 443-444

2. 2. Ginek J., Hedgehog K.: A practical approach to automatic generalization of the text. Proceedings of the ELPUB '03 Conference, Guimarães, Portugal, 2003, pp. 378-388

3. 3. Gong Yu., Liu X.: Generalization of the general text by means of measurement of relevance and the hidden semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM SIGIR International Conference on Information Research and Development, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2001, pp. 19-25.

4. 4. HP Edmundson: New methods for automatic removal. Journal of the Association of Computers 16 (2), 2001, pp 228-264

5. 5.J. Kupiek, J. Pedersen, F. Chen: Summary: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM SIGIR International Conference on Information Search Research and Development, Seattle, Washington, USA, 1995, pp. 68-73