СТРУКТУРА ТА КАЛІБРУВАННЯ ФУНКЦІОНАЛЬНО-ІНТЕГРОВАНИХ ПРИСТРОЇВ МАГНІТНОЇ ДІАГНОСТИКИ ТЕРМОЯДЕРНИХ РЕАКТОРІВ-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

СТРУКТУРА ТА КАЛІБРУВАННЯ ФУНКЦІОНАЛЬНО-ІНТЕГРОВАНИХ ПРИСТРОЇВ МАГНІТНОЇ ДІАГНОСТИКИ ТЕРМОЯДЕРНИХ РЕАКТОРІВ

Published:2022-08 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:61-73
ISSN:2786-4553
Container-title:Information and communication technologies, electronic engineering
language:
Short-container-title:ICTEE

Author:

Большакова I., ,Барило Г.,Голяка Р.^ORCID,Марусенкова Т.,Шуригін Ф.,

Abstract

The analysis of magnetic diagnostics in next generation thermonuclear reactors is carried out. Based on this analysis, the new approach of magnetic field measurement in hard radiation and temperature condition is presented. The concept is based on data fusion concept by integration of Hall sensor and coil. High precision of magnetic field measurement insures on periodic in-situ calibration, namely, forming by the coil test magnetic field of known magnitude and measuring the signals of the Hall sensor, which are due to this test field. According to the results of measuring the test signals, the coefficients of the measuring conversion function are calculated. Main calibration issues of functionally integrated devices on Hall sensors and coils are detailed. Measurement system consists a functionally integrated 3D probe on Hall sensor and coil, analog front-end and software. Currently six sets of such devices have been installed for trial operation in JET (Oxford, GB).

Publisher

Lviv Polytechnic National University

Reference12 articles.

1. [1]. Peruzzo S., Brombin M., Furno Palumbo M., [et al.]. (2016), "Progress in the design and testing of in-vessel magnetic pickup coils for ITER", IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.. Vol. 44, № 9. pp. 1704-1710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2580380.

2. [2]. Zhang Z.,, Fu P., Gao G., [et al.]. (2018), "A Rogowski digital integrator with comb filter signal processing system" IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. V. 46, № 5. pp. 1338-1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2815699.

3. [3]. Vyhnanek J., Ripka P. (2017), "Experimental comparison of the low-frequency noise of small-size magnetic sensors" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. V. 53. № 4. pp.4001304 (4 pp.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2016.2633398.

4. [4]. He X., Wang T., Liu W., Luo T. (2019), "Measurement data fusion based on optimized weighted least-squares algorithm for multi-target tracking", IEEE Access. V. 7. pp. 13901-13916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894641.

5. [5]. Nemec D., Janota A., Hrubos M., Simak V. (2016), "Intelligent real-time MEMS sensor fusion and calibration", IEEE Sensors Journal. V. 16, № 19. pp. 7150-7160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2597292.