SOFTWARE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Author:

Hrytsiuk Yu. I.,

Abstract

The Software quality management system has been developed. The system allows you to determine the state of software quality at each hierarchical level of the management system, taking into account the cost of ensuring the required quality. The system also allows the IT company manager to set the potential costs for the transition of software quality indicators from one state to another. It was found out that software quality is a multifaceted concept that can be adequately expressed by some hierarchical structure of characteristics and attributes, which is called the model of software product quality. To assess the quality of the software, a set of criteria and aggregate indicators were used, which maximally characterise it in terms of functionality and usage options. It is established that the software quality model is the main attribute of the complex system of its assessment. The quality model determines which characteristics of the software product must be taken into account when transiting the control system from one state to another. The level of software quality that meets the stated and indirect needs of various stakeholders and is relevant to them is directly reflected in the quality model of the software product in the form of its properties. The software quality model classifies product properties into characteristics and sub-characteristics. A method for selecting stressful variants of software quality state according to input criteria or aggregate indicators of its current quality has been developed. The method allows to determine the current state of software quality at each hierarchical level according to the corresponding aggregate indicator, taking into account its development cost. A method for selecting the optimal version of the software quality management system from the set of permissible has been developed. The method takes into account the structure of criteria and aggregated indicators of current software quality at each hierarchical level of the management system. It is established that the task of choosing the optimal version of the software quality management system belongs to the tasks of multicriteria optimization. The task takes into account the following criteria: portability of the product and its ease of maintenance, product safety and compatibility, ease of use of the product and reliability of its work, as well as the functional suitability of the product and its efficiency of use. An example of implementation of the software quality management system in both quantitative and cost ratio is given. The example allows us to understand the essence of the method of choosing the optimal variant for the management system, as well as the features of the method of selection of stressful variants of the system state according to two criteria or aggregate indicators.

Publisher

Lviv Polytechnic National University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. [1]     Al­yos­hin, G. V., Panchen­ko, S. V., & Prik­hod­ko, S. I. (2019). Op­ti­mi­za­ti­on of di­gi­tal transmis­si­on systems: textbo­ok. Khar­kiv: Pub­lis­hing hou­se UkrDUZT, 142 p. [In Ukrainian].

2. [2]     Al­yos­hin, G., Ko­lo­miytsev, O., & Tret­yak, V. (2020). Fe­atu­res of op­ti­mal synthe­sis of rich in­for­ma­ti­on systems. Col­lec­ti­on of sci­en­ti­fic works ΛΌGOΣ, 81-84. https://doi.org/10.36074/24.04.2020.v2.23

3. [3]     Azar D., Har­ma­na­ni, H., & Korkmaz, R. (2009, Sep­tem­ber). A hybrid heu­ris­tic appro­ach to op­ti­mi­ze ru­le-ba­sed softwa­re qua­lity es­ti­ma­ti­on mo­dels. In­for­ma­ti­on and Softwa­re Techno­logy, 1365-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.05.003

4. [4]     Bo­egh. J. (2008, March-Ap­ril). A new Stan­dard for Qua­lity Req­ui­re­ments. IEEE Softwa­re, 25(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2008.30

5. [5]     Bot­su­la, M. P., & Mor­hun, I. A. (2011). Me­tod otryman­nia kompleksnoi ot­sinky ya­kos­ti veb-ma­te­ri­aliv z vykorystan­ni­am po­li­ar­noi systemy ko­ordynat. Visnyk Vinnytsko­ho po­li­tekhnichno­ho instytu­tu, 1, 84-88. Ret­ri­eved from: https://visnyk.vntu.edu.ua/in­dex.php/visnyk/ar­tic­le/vi­ew/1367/ con­fe­ren­ces.vntu.edu.ua. [In Ukrainian].

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3