Comparison of modern 3D measurement methods for special tasks of shipbuilding industry-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of modern 3D measurement methods for special tasks of shipbuilding industry

Published:2023-12 Issue:98 Volume:98,2023 Page:15-23
ISSN:2414-9993
Container-title:GEODESY, CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
language:
Short-container-title:ISTCGCAP

Author:

Brusak Ivan, ,Bakuła Krzysztof,Savchuk Nataliia, ,

Abstract

Research presents modern technologies of 3D measurements in shipbuilding production parts. Special template of the keel detail was made for the research. The detail measurements with a laser tracker, laser scanning, industrial photogrammetry and handheld scanning are performed. Leica Absolute Tracker AT960-LR was used for Laser tracker measurements. Laser scanning was performed with Z+F Imager 5010. Nikon D2Xs photo camera was used for Industrial photogrammetry. Handheld scanner DPI-7 from DotProduct was also used for 3D measurements of the details. All collected data were imported into 3DReshaper software for comparison. The accuracy comparison for the specific equipment used in the study is performed. The recommendations for optimal equipment use and software products in this research are also included. The authors also present the assessment of the cost and time spent on the measurements.

Publisher

Lviv Polytechnic National University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference19 articles.

1. 1. Abbas, M. A., Lichti, D. D., Chong, A. K., Setan, H., Majid, Z., Lau, C. L., ... & Ariff, M. F. M. (2017). Improvements to the accuracy of prototype ship models measurement method using terrestrial laser scanner. Measurement, 100, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.053

2. 2. Ackermann, S., Menna, F., Scamardella, A., & Troisi, S. (2008, January). Digital photogrammetry for high precision 3D measurements in shipbuilding field. In 6th CIRP International Conference on ICME-Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Salvatore-Troisi-2/publication/2572...

3. 3. Ahern, C., & Spring, R., 2015. Handheld 3D Capture. Geoinformatics, 18 (2), pp. 18-19. https://www.proquest.com/openview/d247ae7b800189b4d6edfd799b637679/1?pq-...

4. 4. Ahmed, M., Guillemet, A., Shahi, A., Haas, C. T., West, J. S., & Haas, R. C. (2011, June). Comparison of point-cloud acquisition from laser-scanning and photogrammetry based on field experimentation. In Proceedings of the CSCE 3rd International/9th Construction Specialty Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada (pp. 14-17). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mahmoud-Ahmed-13/publication/274374...

5. 5. Burdziakowski, P., & Tysiac, P. (2019). Combined close range photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for ship hull modelling. Geosciences, 9(5), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050242