Principles of legal regulation of the institute of disciplinary responsibility of judges

Author:

Sydorovych RuslanORCID

Abstract

The article analyzes the principles of legal regulation of the civil service institute. The ontological, axiological and praxeological value of the civil service institution, its actualization in the context of Ukraine's European integration efforts, has been proven. It is indicated that today this institution becomes not only an internal mechanism of legitimate, democratic control over the effective exercise of power, but also achieves the necessary functions of transformation of the entire state-power apparatus by improving the power system and bringing it closer to European management standards. The basic principles of legal regulation of the civil service are defined as key standards for the normalization of this institution's functioning of the power system, in particular: legality and legal obligation, which provides that the institution's functioning should be based on clear normative acts and relevant legal norms; transparency and justice, indicates that the process of making state-authority decisions should be open and transparent, include guaranteed opportunities to participate in the process, providing a guarantee for presenting one's position, as well as ensuring the right to defense and the possibility of appealing the decision; confidentiality and protection of personal data, which consists in the fact that all data related to public service must be protected from unauthorized access and use; taking into account the specifics of the activity, it is assumed that when implementing legal and organizational-management measures, one should take into account the specifics of work and foreign-political and internal factors of labor relations; the principle of responsibility of civil servants to society. By creating a complex set of basic principles, they form a matrix of legal regulation of the civil service institution, contribute to an effective and fair rule-making and law enforcement (law enforcement) process in the researched area. The principles guarantee the provision of high standards of behavior of employees and provide a reliable mechanism for monitoring compliance with legal and ethical norms, form an institutional and organizational mechanism for the efficiency and independence of the power system, and are factors in increasing public trust in the decisions of authorities and improving the quality of public administration.

Publisher

Lviv Polytechnic National University

Reference5 articles.

1. "Gorilla exceptions" and the ethically apathetic corporate lawyer;Vaughan S.;Legal Ethics 19(1) 50-75 [in English],2016

2. 2. Bolkvadze K. (2020). To Reform or to Retain? Politicians' Incentives to Clean Up Corrupt Courts in Hybrid Regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 53(3-4), 500-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019859029 [in English].

3. 3. Pilich M. (2021). Disobedience of Judges as a Problem of Legal Philosophy and Comparative Constitutionalism: A Polish Case. Res Publica, 27, 593-617 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09501-8 [in English].

4. Constrained morality in the professional work of corporate lawyers;Chow;Journal of Business Ethics 170 213-228 [in English],2021

5. 5. Dinovitzer R., Gunz H., Gunz S. (2015). Professional ethics: Origins, applications, and developments. In L. Empson, D. Muzio, J. Broschak, & B. Hinings (Eds.), Handbook of professional service firms (pp. 113-134). Oxford University Press [in English].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3