Affiliation:
1. özel aktif kocaeli hastanesi
2. OKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ
Abstract
Objective
Evaluation of hysteroscopic approach, findings and subsequent pregnancy follow-ups in cases of placental retention.
Methods
Between 2015 and 2021, 19 female patients who were referred to our clinic due to placental retention underwent hysteroscopic diagnosis and resection with bipolar cautery. Obstetric histories, preoperative and intraoperative findings of the cases and pregnancy outcomes were followed up.
Results
The mean age of the cases was 31.7 ±5.4 years. Gravida was 2.7 ±1.4, five (26.5%) of the cases had a history of recurrent miscarriage. Two or more therapeutic curettage procedures were performed in 17 of the cases (89.6%) in the cases before referral, 11 (52.6%) had bleeding complaints and 10 (52.6%) had anemia. During the hysteroscopic intervention, uterine anomaly was found in 7 (36.8%) cases and intrauterine synechiae were found in three cases (15.8%). After hysteroscopy during follow-up intrauterine synechia was observed in three (15.8%) cases and thin endometrium was observed in four (21.1%) cases. in the postoperative 15.2±11 months follow-up period infertility was observed in four cases. The follow-up pregnancy rate was 68.7% and take home baby rate was 56% in this study.
Conclusion
In cases of failed removal of conception material despite repeated endometrial aspiration, hysteroscopic approach is an effective one step diagnostik and treat option for removal of conceptus material and correction of accompanying pathologies.
Publisher
Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital
Reference26 articles.
1. 1. Dombrowski MP, Bottoms SF, Saleh AA, Hurd WW, Romero R. Third stage of labor: analysis of duration and clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 1):1279-84.
2. 2. Weeks AD. The Retained Placenta. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22:1103.Modified from: Management of the Third Stage of Labour: (For the Optimal Intrapartum Care Series Edited by Mercedes Bonet, Femi Oladapo and Metin Gülmezoglu). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; S1521-6934; 30044.
3. 3. Wolman I, Altman E, Faith G, Har-Toov J, Amster R, Gull I, Jaffa AJ. Combined clinical and ultrasonographic work-up for the diagnosis of retained products of conception. Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):1162-1164.
4. 4. McEwing RL, Anderson NG, Meates JB, Allen RB, Phillipson GT, Wells JE. Sonographic appearances of the endometrium after termination of pregnancy in asymptomatic versus symptomatic women. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 May;28(5):579-86.
5. 5. Levinsohn-Tavor O, Feldman N, Svirsky R, Smorgick N, Nir-Yoffe A, Maymon R.Ultrasound criteria for managing postpartum patients with suspicion of retention of conception products. Acta Radiol. 2020 Feb;61(2):276-281.