Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire: Structure and Primary Psychometric Characteristics

Author:

Antipina S. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Herzen State Pedagogical University

Abstract

The problem of online aggression has attracted increasing attention over the past decade. Various studies revealed a need for tools that would identify the causes of aggressive behavior in cyberspace. The article presents the results of the adaptation of the English-language Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) by K. C. Runions on 421 Russian-speaking teenagers aged 10–15 years (St. Petersburg). The method features four types of online aggression. K. C. Runions describes the cyber-aggression in teenagers through their motivational goals and the ability to behavioral self-control. The procedures of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model of the original questionnaire. All factors were balanced by the number of statements. The final version of the questionnaire included 23 statements. The structure of the questionnaire was represented by the following factors: impulsive-aversive cyber-aggression, controlled-aversive cyberaggression, controlled-appetitive cyber-aggression, and impulsive-appetitive cyber-aggression. The questionnaire showed good indicators of discriminativeness and reliability; it can serve as a reliable psychological diagnosis tool for studying the phenomenon of cyber-aggression in scientific and practical purposes. Understanding the motivations behind cyber-aggressive behavior can help to develop new preventive measures based on individual differences in the disadaptive factors of online aggression.

Publisher

Kemerovo State University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Soldatova G. U., Chigarkova S. V., Dreneva A. A., Iliukhina S. N. We are responsible for the digital world: Preventing destructive behavior of adolescents and youth on the Internet. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2019, 176. (In Russ.)

2. Bochaver A. A., Kholmov K. D. Cyberbullying: Harassment in the space of modern technologies. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2014, 11(3): 177–191. (In Russ.)

3. Heirman W., Walrave M. Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2008, 2(2). Available at: https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4214/3256 (accessed 4 Aug 2020).

4. Kowalski R. M., Giumetti G. W., Schroeder A. N., Lattanner M. R. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and metaanalysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, 140(4): 1073–1137. DOI: 10.1037/a0035618

5. Panumaporn J., Hongsanguansri S., Atsariyasing W., Kiatrungrit K. Bystanders’ behaviours and associated factors in cyberbullying. General Psychiatry, 2020, 33(3). DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100187

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3