European Union Policy in the South Caucasus after the Karabakh War of 2020

Author:

Yumatov K. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kemerovo State University

Abstract

The article focuses on the transformation of the European Union’s policy in the South Caucasus after the NagornoKarabakh war of 2020. Before the war, the foreign and security policy in the region had depended on the OSCE Minsk Group, Georgia’s role in the Russian-Georgian confrontation, and the Eastern Partnership program for the South Caucasus. After Azerbaijan won the Nagorno-Karabakh war with Turkey’s support, the previous line of policy stopped being effective. It failed to unite the countries of the South Caucasus, to remove the Russian Federation from the region, and to make the European Union a real mediator in the conflict zone. The democratization of the local political regimes also failed, despite the proEuropean position of Georgia and the velvet revolution in Armenia. As a result of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war of 2020, Russian and Turkish troops entered the South Caucasus, and Russia, Turkey, and Iran started acting as peace mediators. The European Union failed to strengthen the role of the OSCE Minsk Group and the mechanisms of the Eastern Partnership in the region. Ever since 2020, it has been trying to develop a common policy for all ethnic and inter-confessional conflicts in the postSoviet space. The European Union keeps failing in its competition and partnership with Russia, while Turkey is getting more active and independent in the region. Thus, the European Union will have to develop a new model of influence in the South Caucasus and the whole post-Soviet space. In the current global confrontation, it is very important to find an international actor able and willing to interact with all parties. The European Union seems to be the one, and its actions in resolving regional conflicts require a detailed research. 

Publisher

Kemerovo State University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Eurasian arc of instability and regional security issues from East Asia to North Africa, ed. Kolotov V. N. St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2013, 576. (In Russ.)

2. Eurasian arc of instability and regional security issues from East Asia to North Africa: results of 2016, ed. Kolotov V. N. St. Petersburg: NK-Print, 2017, 832. (In Russ.)

3. Huntington S. P. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. N. Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1996, 368.

4. Dzhadan I. The Five-Day War. Russia is compelling to peace. Moscow: Evropa, 2008, 130. (In Russ.)

5. Toropygin A. V. Bishkek Protocol. How it was: memories and comments. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, and Politics, 2019, (1): 71–78. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3