Affiliation:
1. Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation
2. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Kemerovo branch)
Abstract
The article features the problem of consolidating and understanding the digital sovereignty of the State and the individual. The author addresses the challenge of establishing a correlation between the idea of digital sovereignty and the global socio-political change. The paper focuses on the effect of modern trends of social development, i.e. accelerated social informatization and globalization, on the development of doctrine of digital sovereignty and its legal design. The author believes that the idea of digital sovereignty is a reaction to the transformation of the global social order, which resulted in new doctrinal provisions and legal norms. They give citizens the right to determine the process of formation, storage, and management of digital data, as well as to ensure their inviolability. The legal formalization of digital sovereignty can indicate either the protection of statehood and personality or, on the contrary, their absorption by structures of the global order. As a result, such categories as "sovereignty, "statehood, or "personality" may eventually lose their actual meaning and real content. The conceptualization of the phenomenon of neurosovereignty and its implementation programs might be the future of the theory and practice of sovereignty.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference22 articles.
1. Сиваш Е. М. Вопрос суверенитета в актах Великой французской революции и Священного союза // Проблемы законности. 2011. № 115. С. 228–237., Sivash E. M. Questions of sovereignty are in the acts of Great French Revolution and the Holy Alliance. Problemy zakonnosti, 2011, (115): 228–237. (In Russ.)
2. Бредихин А. Л., Проценко Е. Д. Принципы и свойства государственного суверенитета // Академический юридический журнал. 2016. № 3. С. 4–12., Bredikhin A. L., Protsenko E. D. Principles and properties of State sovereignty. Akademicheskij yuridicheskij zhurnal, 2016, (3): 4–12. (In Russ.)
3. Реут О. Ч. Прилагательные суверенитета. Суверенитет как прилагательное // Полис. Политические исследования. 2007. № 3. С. 115–124. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.03.09, Reut O. Ch. Adjectives of sovereignty. Sovereignty as an adjective. Polis. Political Studies, 2007, (3): 115–124. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.03.09
4. Токарев В. А. К вопросу о понятии «обладатель суверенитета» (сравнительно-правовой аспект) // Известия вузов. Правоведение. 2016. № 3. С. 130–139., Tokarev V. A. To the issue of the concept of the "sovereignty holder" (comparative legal analysis). Izvestiia vuzov. Pravovedenie, 2016, (3): 130–139. (In Russ.)
5. Зорина Е. Г. Информационный суверенитет современного государства и основные инструменты его обеспечения // Изв. Сарат. ун-та. Нов. сер. Сер. Социология. Политология. 2017. Т. 17. № 3. С. 345–348. DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2017-17-3-345-348, Zorina E. G. Informational sovereignty of contemporary state and the main instruments of its ensuring. Izv. Saratov. Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Sociology. Politology, 2017, 17(3): 345–348. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2017-17-3-345-348
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献