Affiliation:
1. Permskiy gosudarstvennyy nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet
2. Perm State University
Abstract
A clear and unambiguous rendering of spatial relations is the key cognitive function of communication. Spatial relationships reflect the categories and experience shared by all people. The paper introduces
the first-of-its-kind attempt to describe the dual spatial orientation of the speaker in virtual reality as depending on two factors: the communicative situation and the gender. Dual spatial orientation combines egocentric, allocentric, or geocentric orientations and their varieties. The combination depends on various factors. The experiment in virtual environment involved 24 informants and five scenarios (scenes) with different communicative parameters. It yielded 725 responses with combinations of double orientations, which went through the IS Semograph. The combination of allocentric and geocentric orientation domineered; the extra-linguistic gender factor and some communicative parameters affected the frequency of combinations of dual spatial orientation. The core of the speaker’s dual spatial orientation in virtual reality combined allocentric and geocentric orientations to the topos of GE \ T + AL and AL + GE \ T.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference27 articles.
1. Талески А. Поведение говорящего в виртуальной реальности (методика эксперимента и описание предварительных результатов). Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология. 2020. Т. 12. № 4. С. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2020-4-54-67, Taleski A. Speaker's behavior in virtual reality (methodology of the experiment and description of preliminary results). Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2020, 12(4): 54–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2020-4-54-67
2. Berthele R. Ort und Weg. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, 305., Berthele R. Ort und Weg. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, 305.
3. Bohil C., Owen Ch. B., Jeong E. J., Alicea B., Biocca F. Virtual reality and presence. 21st century communication: A reference handbook, ed. Eadie W. F. Newbury park: Sage, 2009, 534–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412964005, Bohil C., Owen Ch. B., Jeong E. J., Alicea B., Biocca F. Virtual reality and presence. 21st century communication: A reference handbook, ed. Eadie W. F. Newbury park: Sage, 2009, 534–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412964005
4. Bryant D. J. A spatial representation system in humans. Psycholoquy, 1992, 3(16). URL: https://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?3.16 (accessed 23 Apr 2024)., Bryant D. J. A spatial representation system in humans. Psycholoquy, 1992, 3(16). URL: https://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?3.16 (accessed 23 Apr 2024).
5. Byagowi A., Moussavi Z. Design of a Virtual Reality Navigational (VRN) experiment for assessment of egocentric spatial cognition. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Proc. Conf., San Diego, 1 Sep 2012. San Diego: IEEE, 2012, 4812–4815. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347070, Byagowi A., Moussavi Z. Design of a Virtual Reality Navigational (VRN) experiment for assessment of egocentric spatial cognition. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Proc. Conf., San Diego, 1 Sep 2012. San Diego: IEEE, 2012, 4812–4815. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347070