Phenomenology of Digital Academic Dishonesty at University

Author:

Klopkova Elizaveta1,Miklyaeva Anastasiya1

Affiliation:

1. Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

Abstract

The article describes the phenomenology of academic dishonesty in offline and online learning. The authors developed a questionnaire to assess the occurrence of various types of cheating, students’ subjective attitude to academic dishonesty, and its context. The study involved 52 university students aged 18–25 (37 female respondents). The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis using the G-criterion and the Fisher’s angular transformation. The content analysis consisted of questions that required an extended answer. In online environment, the most common form of academic dishonesty was cheating at exams and tests by copying a fellow student's digital work, imitating technical problems, googling for answers, and providing false references. Students treated online academic dishonesty as more acceptable than during face-to-face learning. The study proves that the phenomenology of online academic dishonesty is significantly different from its traditional variant and, therefore, requires more detailed research.

Publisher

Kemerovo State University

Reference16 articles.

1. Безгодова С. А., Микляева А. В. Академический обман в цифровой среде: социально-психологический анализ. Science for Education Today. 2021. Т. 11. № 4. С. 64–90. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.04, Bezgodova S. A., Miklyaeva A. V. Digital academic dishonesty: a socio-psychological analysis. Science for Education Today, 2021, 11(4): 64–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.04

2. Спасенников В. В., Андросов К. Ю. Академическое мошенничество и мотивация учебной деятельности студентов современных университетов. Эргодизайн. 2020. № 2. С. 72–80. https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2020-2-72-80, Spasennikov V. V., Androsov K. Y. Academic fraud and motivation of modern universities students’ educational activities. Ergodesign, 2020, (2): 72–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2020-2-72-80

3. Amigud A., Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019, 45(1): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851, Amigud A., Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019, 45(1): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851

4. Bacon A. M., McDaid C., Williams N., Corr P. J. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, 90(1): 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269, Bacon A. M., McDaid C., Williams N., Corr P. J. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, 90(1): 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269

5. Bretag T., Harper R., Burton M., Ellis C., Newton P. H., Rozenberg P., Saddiqui S., van Haeringen K. Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 44(11): 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788, Bretag T., Harper R., Burton M., Ellis C., Newton P. H., Rozenberg P., Saddiqui S., van Haeringen K. Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 44(11): 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3