Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
Many Russian regions depend on gratuitous transfers from the federal center. These regions lag behind the average Russian level of economic development and standard of living, which creates uneven prerequisites for economic growth. In addition, such regions attract no investments, and the effectiveness of the use of federal money is often impossible to assess. These conditions lead to inequal economic development, living standards, and welfare in different regions, which creates social tension and hinders the economic growth of the whole country. The research relied on the theory of strategy and methodology of strategizing developed by V.L. Kvint, Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Honored Worker of the Higher School of the Russian Federation, whose projects have been successfully implemented in a number of regional and sectoral strategies. According to the general methodology of strategizing, new opportunities are determined by analyzing global, sectoral, and regional trends. The present research featured the subsidized region of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. The proposed term of subsidized economic condition made it possible to take into account the peculiarities of such regions during strategizing. The author developed some tools for assessing the effectiveness of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic’s exit strategy from subsidized economy. The main strategic priority was to improve the quality of life in the region, as well as to increase the level of its financial independence. Conclusion. The analysis made it possible to identify and substantiate the theoretical features of strategizing the exit from subsidized economy, as well as to develop some tools for assessing the effectiveness of this strategy for the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference25 articles.
1. Абалкин Л. И. Конечные народнохозяйственные результаты: Сущность, показатели, пути повышения. М.: Экономика, 1982. 183 c., Abalkin LI. Konechnye narodnokhozyaystvennye rezulʹtaty: Sushchnostʹ, pokazateli, puti povysheniya [Final national economic results: Essence, indicators, and improvement prospects]. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 1982. 183 p. (In Russ.)
2. Аганбегян А. Г. Анализ и прогнозирование социально-экономического развития регионов России (методические заметки) // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2019. Т. 14. № 4. С. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2019-14-4-15-28, Aganbegyan AG. Analysis and forecasting of socio-economic development of regions (methodical notes). Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;14(4):15–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2019-14-4-15-28
3. Аганбегян А. Г. Управление и эффективность. М.: Экономика, 1981. 71 с., Aganbegyan AG. Upravlenie i ehffektivnostʹ [Management and efficiency]. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 1981. 71 p. (In Russ.)
4. Бахтизин А. Р. Агент-ориентированные модели экономики. М.: Экономика, 2008. 279 с., Bakhtizin AR. Agent-orientirovannye modeli ehkonomiki [Agent-based models of economy]. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 2008. 279 p. (In Russ.)
5. Глазьев С. Ю. Стратегия опережающего развития России в условиях глобального кризиса. М.: Экономика, 2010. 254 с., Glazʹev SYu. Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh globalʹnogo krizisa [Russia's advanced development strategy in the conditions of the global crisis]. Mosow: Ehkonomika; 2010. 254 p.