Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
The current domestic strategizing practice needs significant improvements. On the one hand, innovative strategies should factor in the extreme variability of external environment. On the other hand, they should address long-term trends and goals, e.g., climate change, low-carbon economy, etc. This research featured the industrial strategizing of the Russian economy. In spite of the rapid changes postulated by the concepts of VUCA and BANI, proper strategizing can support effective transformations of companies and industries by cascading and synchronizing different economic policies. Most state-approved industrial strategies provide an effective in-depth situation analysis and problem definition but, being aimed at solving current problems, lack a long-term vision. As a result, they turn into catch-up development strategies that are unable to form leading positions in the future. The long-term goal of any innovative strategy is to develop the existing competencies, competitive advantages, and resource opportunities in order to attract additional resources and create new competitive advantages. Initially, industrial strategies can be limited to minimum allowable investment level that provide effective interaction between business, science, and the state, e.g., special economic zones, industrial clusters, digital platforms, etc. The resulting horizontal connections protect the economic system from the changing external environment.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference19 articles.
1. Астапов К. Л. Постиндустриальные вызовы российской экономике. М.: ТЕИС, 2009. 270 с., Astapov KL. Postindustrialʹnye vyzovy rossiyskoy ehkonomike [Post-industrial challenges to the Russian economy]. Moscow: TEIS; 2009. 270 p. (In Russ.)
2. Бобылев С. Н., Соловьева С. В., Кирюшин П. А. Крах глобальной модели потребления: в поисках устойчивости // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2022. Т. 66. № 11. С. 92–100. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-92-100, Bobylev SN, Solovyeva SV, Kiryushin PA. The collapse of the global consumption model: In search of sustainability. World Economy and International Relations. 2022;66(11):92–100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-92-100
3. Друкер П. Ф. Менеджмент. Вызовы XXI века. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2012. 235 с., Druker PF. Menedzhment. Vyzovy XXI veka [Management. Challenges of the XXI century]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber; 2012. 235 p. (In Russ.)
4. Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: Экономика, общество и культура. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2000. 608 с., Kastelʹs M. Informatsionnaya ehpokha: Ehkonomika, obshchestvo i kulʹtura [The age of information: Economy, society, and culture]. Moscow: HSE University; 2000. 608 p. (In Russ.)
5. Квинт В. Л., Астапов К. Л. Стратегия Кузбасса на 50-летнюю перспективу в книгах Библиотеки «Стратегия Кузбасса» // Стратегирование: теория и практика. 2021. Т. 1. № 2. С. 123–135. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-2-123-135, Kvint VL, Astapov KL. Kuzbass Strategy over 50-year planning horizon: Publications on Strategy of the Kuzbass Region. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2021;1(2):123–135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2021-1-2-123-135