Affiliation:
1. Limited liability company “Tekhnologiya dobychi”
2. Kemerovo State University
Abstract
In the face of unprecedented sanctions, Russian industries require a new strategy for industrial equipment production. However, its strategizing in the new conditions require a thorough scientific analysis. This article proposes some strategic priorities for the production of industrial equipment in the modern economic conditions. The research featured enterprises that produce industrial equipment in the Kemerovo Region. The methodology relies on the theory of strategy and the methodology of strategizing developed by Professor V. L. Kvint, as well as on the economic theories about the new normal. The OTSW analysis revealed the key trends in the production of industrial equipment, as well as the possibilities for its development as an object of strategizing. The analysis involved the values and interests of industry stakeholders and the mission of industrial equipment production. Depending on competitive advantages, strategic priorities are divided into first and second order priorities. The priorities of the first order include cluster cooperation and joint projects; an innovative ecosystem based on an open innovation model; strategic synergy of development plans with customers and suppliers. The second-order strategic priorities include the export of products to friendly countries and a complete range of high-quality mining equipment. The results can be used in decision-making by industrial equipment manufacturers, consumers, and regional authorities.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Reference21 articles.
1. Борисов В. Н., Почукаева О. В. Инновационное машиностроение как фактор развивающего импортозамещения // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2015. № 3. С. 31–42., Borisov VN, Pochukaeva OV. Innovative machine engineering as a factor of developing import substitution. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2015;(3): 31–42. (In Russ.)
2. Борисов В. Н., Почукаева О. В. Отечественное машиностроение как фактор научно-технологического развития экономики РФ // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2019. Т. 10, № 1. С. 12–25. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2019.10.1.12-25., Borisov VN, Pochukaeva OV. Domestic engineering as a factor of scientific and technological development of the Russian economy. MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2019;10(1):12–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2019.10.1.12-25
3. Гнатик Е. Н. «Новая нормальность» эпохи COVID-19: возможности, ограничения, риски // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2021. Т. 21. № 4. С. 769–782. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-4-769-782, Gnatik EN. «New normality» of the covid-19 era: Opportunities, limitations, risks. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2021;21(4):769–782. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-4-769-782
4. Дементьев Е. В., Новикова Е. С., Устюжанина Е. В. Место России в глобальных цепочках создания стоимости // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. 2016. № 1. С. 17–30., Dementev VE, Novikova ES, Ustyuzhanina EV. Russia's place in global value chains. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2016;(1):17–30. (In Russ.)
5. Дынкин А. А. В поисках новой нормальности // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2015. Т. 195. № 6. С. 466–480., Dynkin AA. In search of a new normality. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2015;195(6):466–480. (In Russ.)