Affiliation:
1. V. G. Timiryasov Kazan Innovative University
Abstract
Intellectual contracts based on blockchain technology improve the efficiency of supply management of an automobile enterprise by optimizing the transactional costs of supply logistics. The present research featured KAMAZ PTC. The goal was to develop an interaction mechanism for all participants of an intellectual contract in supply activities. The article includes a review of Russian and foreign publications about intellectual contracts in various business spheres, supply management efficiency, optimization of transactional costs, and blockchain technology. The study made it possible to build an interaction mechanism of the parties involved in a blockchain intellectual contract. It also revealed a pattern of changes introduced to the intellectual contract at different stages of interaction between the initiator and suppliers. The authors also highlighted the difference between smart contract and intellectual contract. An intellectual contract appears as a logical development of a smart contract and allows the sides to change the terms. The party interaction mechanism can improve the supply efficiency as it optimizes the magnitude of transactional costs.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics
Reference27 articles.
1. Иващенко Н. П., Шаститко А. Е., Шпакова А. А. Смарт-контракты в свете новой институциональной экономической теории // Журнал институциональных исследований. 2019. Т. 11. № 3. C. 64–83. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.064-083, Ivashchenko N. P., Shastitko A. Ye., Shpakova A. A. Smart contracts throught lens of the new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2019, 11(3): 64–83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.064-083
2. Финогеев А. Г., Васин С. М., Гамидуллаева Л. А., Финогеев А. А. Технология смарт контрактов на основе блокчейн для минимиза-ции трансакционных издержек в региональных инновационных системах // Вопросы безопасности. 2018. № 3. С. 34–55. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2018.3.26619, Finogeev A. G., Vasin S. M., Gamidullaeva L. A., Finogeev A. A. The use of the blockchain-based smart contracts technology for minimization of transaction costs in regional innovation systems. Voprosy bezopasnosti, 2018, (3): 34–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2018.3.26619
3. Шульженко Т. Г. Методологический подход к реинжинирингу логистических бизнес-процессов в транспортных цепях при внедре-нии технологии смарт-контрактов // Управленческие науки. 2020. Т. 10. № 2. C. 53–73. https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-2-53-73, Shulzhenko T. G. Methodological approach to the reengineering of logistics business processes in the transport chains with the implementation of smart contracts. Upravlencheskie nauki, 2020, 10(2): 53–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-2-53-73
4. Трунцевский Ю. В., Севальнев В. В. Смарт-контракт: от определения к определенности // Право. Журнал Высшей школы эконо-мики. 2020. № 1. С. 118–147. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2020.1.118.147, Truntsevsky Yu. V., Sevalnev V. V. Smart contracts: from identification to certainty. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2020, (1): 118–147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2020.1.118.147
5. Angrish A., Craver B., Hasan M., Starly B. A case study for blockchain in manufacturing: «FabRec»: a prototype for peer-to-peer network of manufacturing nodes // Procedia Manufacturing: Proc. NAMRC 46 (College Station, Texas, 18–22 Jun 2018) College Station: Texas A&M University, 2018. Vol. 26. P. 1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.154, Angrish A., Craver B., Hasan M., Starly B. A case study for blockchain in manufacturing: "FabRec": a prototype for peer-to-peer network of manufacturing nodes. Procedia Manufacturing: Proc. NAMRC 46, College Station, Texas, 18–22 Jun 2018. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2018, vol. 26, 1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.154