Affiliation:
1. Siberian Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3. Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Abstract
Effective risk management needs new approaches to risk analysis, especially in multi-agent investment projects. The article focuses on cluster projects currently active in the Novosibirsk Region, as well as on specific financial risks that occur between interacting organizations of various ownership forms. The author studied the assessment methodology for risks that develop as a result of unreliable or incomplete information, violation of state subsidies, their repayment, etc. The analysis of Novosibirsk clusters involved the Kontur. Focus software. The proposed methods included defining key parameters of the control model, procedures for input reliability check, a diagnostic methodology for project members, and integrating the effectiveness of the cluster control system. These approaches and methods can be included in a new integrated approach to the mesolevel risk management of multi-agent cluster projects as part of state and corporate control.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics
Reference30 articles.
1. Ардашева Е. П. Типология мезоэкономики. Вестник технологического университета. 2007. № 3-4. С. 218–229. EDN: IJWAZF, Ardasheva E. P. Typology of mesoeconomics. Vestnik tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2007, (3-4): 218–229. (In Russ.) EDN: IJWAZF
2. Безденежных В. М., Индарбаев А. А. Методические подходы к анализу факторов риска мезоуровня инвестиционных проектов госпрограмм. Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. 2020. № 3. С. 55–60. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-3-55-60, Bezdenezhnykh V. M., Indarbaev A. A. Methodological approaches to the analysis of risk factors of mesolevel investment projects of state programs. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, 2020, (3): 55–60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-3-55-60
3. Марков Л. С., Ягольницер М. А. Мезоэкономические системы: проблемы типологии. Регион: Экономика и Социология. 2008. № 1. С. 18–44. EDN: IXVYUN, Markov L. S., Yagolnitser M. A. Meso-economic systems: issues of typology. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya, 2008, (1): 18–44. (In Russ.) EDN: IXVYUN
4. Мезоэкономика: элементы новой парадигмы, ред. В. И. Маевский, С. Г. Кирдина-Чэндлер. М.: ИЭ РАН, 2020. 123 с. EDN: RAKJZP, Mesoeconomics: elements of a new paradigm, eds. Maevsky V. I., Kirdina-Chandler S. G. Moscow: IE RAS, 2020, 123. (In Russ.) EDN: RAKJZP
5. Бурук А. Ф., Котёлкин Д. Д., Марков Л. С. Кластерный проект: понятия, типология, подходы к моделированию. Мир экономики и управления. 2017. Т. 17. № 3. С. 132–142. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-3-132-142, Buruk A. F., Kotelkin D. D., Markov L. S. Cluster project: concepts, typology and modeling approaches. World of Economics and Management, 2017, 17(3): 132–142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-3-132-142